From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K2MWy-0002j6-7n for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 31 May 2008 08:33:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D93FDE02A5; Sat, 31 May 2008 08:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rv-out-0708.google.com [209.85.198.246]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C67E02A5 for ; Sat, 31 May 2008 08:33:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so171267rvf.46 for ; Sat, 31 May 2008 01:33:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=0NK/9+OZH/R+BB522Hyt8Tc0TbYkeF6BC5NhXwM3LDQ=; b=kIMbbmfa/YZw2DE5FpWPsZddMwVm+xIW/NrGelmbII3vhbfb6CIp+5CQHPyQL4cjShmE3y8x/SyW1p5RCmrFFYYjGBCmu1pB3u4+cM9YJe202wST9Sar0o2JviP1Uq7O2q6xRhIxxbGCU19A66WcJMQqe+Alp1EJE+ofw1FxHgE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=P+/syCMCBgkuK+oV9jsp+SxevInXmKG0NbpO8KOuihAGVP0DKoIZ5Llpkq0Ydil6Uvgzif3ml+kt9jO64dNWyZTxnKNSrfoMEIfGRZZf4S40z80Jn6YvxpZb/XJmQgBFRFPop12hLvOFHhtmGqsVdJdjcqnEA4dIWxAxC4s7IsE= Received: by 10.115.59.4 with SMTP id m4mr7370363wak.104.1212222816972; Sat, 31 May 2008 01:33:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.88.8 with HTTP; Sat, 31 May 2008 01:33:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 08:33:36 +0000 From: Beso To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE 4.0.4 upgrade, sort of. In-Reply-To: <200805302318.18720.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_29215_27675824.1212222816956" References: <483D3324.3030709@ercbroadband.org> <200805302216.07276.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <200805302128.47697.levertond@googlemail.com> <200805302318.18720.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> X-Archives-Salt: 35c1fe49-370a-4081-a36b-9b472f144ed2 X-Archives-Hash: b34094123d6dad6a9ae64886c84ec113 ------=_Part_29215_27675824.1212222816956 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline 2008/5/30 Hemmann, Volker Armin : > On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote: > > On Friday 30 May 2008 21:16:06 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > > On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote: > > > > I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. > Even > > > > tho I'm running only a single computer > > > > > > there is another reason not to use paludis: > > > > > > you can't go back. > > > > > > At least not easily. > > > > That is a vicious, ridiculous lie (and the rest only gets worse). > > http://www.gentooexperimental.org/not-the-gwn/not-the-gwn-current.html > > for some numbers. > > typical paludis-supporter behaviour: > http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2007/01/be-careful-when-you-are-on-paludis.html > > ciaranm, known to game the system. Abusive against users. > rbrown&spb, just removed because of their abusive behaviour. > > And think about that: why is there a whole bunch of paludis support threads > in > f.g.o? > > And why is there not one for pkgcore? (hint, because it is so easy to use) > -- > gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list > > as i've said before: it's not fair to judge the quality of the software by its producers. i don't agree on how they behave, but that doesn't imply that if they behave in that way their software is by default bad. -- dott. ing. beso ------=_Part_29215_27675824.1212222816956 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline 2008/5/30 Hemmann, Volker Armin <volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de>:
On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
> On Friday 30 May 2008 21:16:06 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> > On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote:
> > > I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support.  Even
> > > tho I'm running only a single computer
> >
> > there is another reason not to use paludis:
> >
> > you can't go back.
> >
> > At least not easily.
>
> That is a vicious, ridiculous lie (and the rest only gets worse).

http://www.gentooexperimental.org/not-the-gwn/not-the-gwn-current.html

for some numbers.

typical paludis-supporter behaviour:
http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2007/01/be-careful-when-you-are-on-paludis.html

ciaranm, known to game the system. Abusive against users.
rbrown&spb, just removed because of their abusive behaviour.

And think about that: why is there a whole bunch of paludis support threads in
f.g.o?

And why is there not one for pkgcore? (hint, because it is so easy to use)

as i've said before: it's not fair to judge the quality of the software by its producers. i don't agree on how they behave, but that doesn't imply that if they behave in that way their software is by default bad.


--
dott. ing. beso ------=_Part_29215_27675824.1212222816956-- -- gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list