well, just removing ~amd64 from your make.conf and eselect profile set default-linux/amd64/2007.0 and then emerge -uDNvp will let you see what would compile. if you instead want to rebuild from scratch then funtoo has recent compiled stages that would let you not compile a lot of updated stuff. 2008/1/29, agtdino : > > Well, my system is uptime since for a long time and has many updates > more than I belive!,, :D > For the moments is running well, I dont be a freek of gentoo but when I > buy the amd64 system I had to make something hard step's to startit, > perhaps it's not something clean and it's has profiles to the pass. > I go to think in change this profile, or it reinstall from scratch ( is > more fastest but the less interesting :( ) > > Thank's and regards > > El mar, 29-01-2008 a las 09:56 +0000, Beso escribió: > > i think that if you're using the flags you're using you're a real > > gentoo poweruser. but the fact that the profile is still set to 2006.1 > > makes me wonder if you really know what you're doing... > > someone who usually uses the flags you're using also uses the latest > > profile. > > i really think that you should update your profile (use eselect > > profile to do it, i think that 2006.1 would disappear in some months) > > and then compile at least the base system from the amd64 branch. then > > you could use gcc-4.2.2 and other things the way you want. i > > personally use a lot of unstable stuff, but the base system is amd64 > > and not ~amd64. > > > > 2008/1/29, agtdino : > > Hello, Thank's for the response I will change kernel to > > 2.6.23-r6. > > > > Regard's > > > > El mar, 29-01-2008 a las 02:31 -0600, Steev Klimaszewski > > escribió: > > > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 09:17 +0100, agtdino wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > Hi! > > > > > > I am the maintainer of madwifi-ng - it is currently > > incompatible (well > > > there is a patch in bugzilla however it is not the proper > > fix) with > > > 2.6.24 - if you absolutely must have 2.6.24, then you will > > need to > > > compile the madwifi modules from svn, until they put out a > > release > > > (which *should* be soon, they are only waiting on two > > patches) that is > > > compatible with 2.6.24. > > > > > > Sorry for your troubles, for now, unless it is absolutely > > necessary, I > > > would suggest continuing using 2.6.23-r6 > > > > > > -- Steev > > > > > > > -- > > gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list > > > > > > > > > > -- > > dott. ing. beso > > -- > gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list > > -- dott. ing. beso