From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JJnD3-0007hl-WB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:56:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6467E042B; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:56:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.153]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D14E042B for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:56:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so1997799fga.14 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:56:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=K1v0HZoY/QRnnFa0O6puO9n/F6QmImP7ChoiAc3rrDw=; b=aR4Hp9KgxxmVgL/h+3Vvf2rUy4/ViqXhhBE3umeIPo+UadywsgwL6GZMe5UmSR8SV2eDAxZlscxKW7E5FMiyWuUdM0i/SsNzS4zlG/ttL3PIYBf4ZVKpKU+rwIg5U+SR0G2RDI9DVWq/VB3KHK98h0adL1/GADxhSsptlqt/5hg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=JklyZiJNGwsah59rOaolCeU1IRFknFnPpeh+OYChgHvcdW2Him998ko6dYy+z3okQa0pgaFSw1puIDb8A8eZkTbND+742mNIhLkAPkDPe1ejB07aQIvGNC2TPcSJuPTeDwMFamMxiKogELAlDh/nHmduS76M5ny5jsQZo6KVs1o= Received: by 10.82.145.7 with SMTP id s7mr11857543bud.7.1201600611644; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:56:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.141.7 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:56:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 09:56:51 +0000 From: Beso To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] madwifi-ng not compile in amd64 In-Reply-To: <1201597204.29366.9.camel@gentoo> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_14448_5024420.1201600611636" References: <1201555535.24379.1.camel@gentoo> <200801282352.43451.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <1201594632.29366.6.camel@gentoo> <1201595503.27687.1.camel@kilik.ubersekret.info> <1201597204.29366.9.camel@gentoo> X-Archives-Salt: f0cde306-cd25-4d24-b591-0b41dc42801f X-Archives-Hash: 5acdb2fede5b2181cfedacabaa9dbd8e ------=_Part_14448_5024420.1201600611636 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline i think that if you're using the flags you're using you're a real gentoo poweruser. but the fact that the profile is still set to 2006.1 makes me wonder if you really know what you're doing... someone who usually uses the flags you're using also uses the latest profile. i really think that you should update your profile (use eselect profile to do it, i think that 2006.1 would disappear in some months) and then compile at least the base system from the amd64 branch. then you could use gcc-4.2.2and other things the way you want. i personally use a lot of unstable stuff, but the base system is amd64 and not ~amd64. 2008/1/29, agtdino : > > Hello, Thank's for the response I will change kernel to 2.6.23-r6. > > Regard's > > El mar, 29-01-2008 a las 02:31 -0600, Steev Klimaszewski escribi=F3: > > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 09:17 +0100, agtdino wrote: > > > Hi, > > Hi! > > > > I am the maintainer of madwifi-ng - it is currently incompatible (well > > there is a patch in bugzilla however it is not the proper fix) with > > 2.6.24 - if you absolutely must have 2.6.24, then you will need to > > compile the madwifi modules from svn, until they put out a release > > (which *should* be soon, they are only waiting on two patches) that is > > compatible with 2.6.24. > > > > Sorry for your troubles, for now, unless it is absolutely necessary, I > > would suggest continuing using 2.6.23-r6 > > > > -- Steev > > > > -- > gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list > > --=20 dott. ing. beso ------=_Part_14448_5024420.1201600611636 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline i think that if you're using the flags you're using you're a re= al gentoo poweruser. but the fact that the profile is still set to 2006.1 m= akes me wonder if you really know what you're doing...
someone who u= sually uses the flags you're using also uses the latest profile.
i really think that you should update your profile (use eselect profile to = do it, i think that 2006.1 would disappear in some months) and then compile= at least the base system from the amd64 branch. then you could use gcc-4.2= .2 and other things the way you want. i personally use a lot of unstable st= uff, but the base system is amd64 and not ~amd64.

2008/1/29, agtdino <agtdino@teleline.es>:
Hello, Thank's for the response I will change kernel to 2.6.23-r6.
<= br>Regard's

El mar, 29-01-2008 a las 02:31 -0600, Steev Klimasze= wski escribi=F3:
> On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 09:17 +0100, agtdino wrote:<= br> > > Hi,
> Hi!
>
> I am the maintainer of madwifi-ng= - it is currently incompatible (well
> there is a patch in bugzilla = however it is not the proper fix) with
> 2.6.24 - if you absolutely m= ust have 2.6.24, then you will need to
> compile the madwifi modules from svn, until they put out a release
= > (which *should* be soon, they are only waiting on two patches) that is=
> compatible with 2.6.24.
>
> Sorry for your troubles, f= or now, unless it is absolutely necessary, I
> would suggest continuing using 2.6.23-r6
>
> -- Steev
&= gt;

--
gentoo-am= d64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list




--
dott. ing. beso ------=_Part_14448_5024420.1201600611636-- -- gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org mailing list