From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-amd64+bounces-8740-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1IioTq-00026Z-1a
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:49:22 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with SMTP id l9J9awfe027407;
Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:36:58 GMT
Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.190])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l9J9avUK027401
for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:36:57 GMT
Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 19so772626fkr
for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
bh=DRMGVniP6wouqNnlMcsHcDUS+mK5diToQG+RNbzhBeg=;
b=NmXEAMn5J/igjLLxHfmyTcYOIF9VmMDOJXIaAKoyQmqEveQJgywNGF11EVYOluomOEuMi8D8dUo7W9u1ZEPHvMRSVG1hdi/fZGyvERxAFTB/UotGVY07I5IKc+JOvBK4k3+YIy69Ek4ZHAQx0DSLtlxgqx0VCaoIaKT9e9DNI8s=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;
b=EKZR+xQzCoJY0Z911uOtweJae91a1Jh78sUSMbzyPNujqRDqsDViGGkGffH3KdLt/L0uxsA/jBDFUGorLuGVChfwujoGqJUjPDfiGk6PRlyMpsUq27vGLGgTb/xPP4L74JiZ34NeKGcZD5/FNxnm2Qb/nqItWNmk3jP0AM/dxRc=
Received: by 10.82.172.10 with SMTP id u10mr3150330bue.1192786613646;
Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.82.135.4 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Oct 2007 02:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <d257c3560710190236q3de96984h39a5a092c30b4528@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 11:36:53 +0200
From: Beso <givemesugarr@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] paludis Was: glibc-2.6.1 cpu error
In-Reply-To: <pan.2007.10.19.09.11.06@cox.net>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-amd64.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_Part_6648_7933409.1192786613640"
References: <d257c3560710170112u6c8769a9j78eeb474899102d6@mail.gmail.com>
<pan.2007.10.17.14.16.34@cox.net>
<d257c3560710171006i2ae2af28q64922c7c3f3416ac@mail.gmail.com>
<pan.2007.10.17.19.18.12@cox.net>
<d257c3560710171419k6c821d8fm70b60547a38de390@mail.gmail.com>
<pan.2007.10.18.09.21.12@cox.net>
<d257c3560710180732t6d270ca1pec4697ea7fc5817a@mail.gmail.com>
<pan.2007.10.19.09.11.06@cox.net>
X-Archives-Salt: 548882a2-540f-4270-94fe-9a94d2800fce
X-Archives-Hash: 6c68b4b4d9caff847603f5e4930ea41d
------=_Part_6648_7933409.1192786613640
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
2007/10/19, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>:
>
> Beso <givemesugarr@gmail.com> posted
> d257c3560710180732t6d270ca1pec4697ea7fc5817a@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
> below, on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:32:11 +0200:
>
> > i recompiled gcc and used portage and that worked. i think that mine is
> > a paludis bug. i'll post the bug on the paludis bugzilla. thanks for
> > your help anyway.
>
> Thanks for the fix report. You may be right. I've not used paludis.
>
> Talking about which... does paludis have proper binary package support
> yet? That's the main reason I hadn't tried it back some time ago (when
> ciaranm was still a Gentoo dev, IIRC). Portage's FEATURES=buildpkg is my
> favorite underdocumented power-user portage feature (for all sorts of
> reasons I could detail but don't really belong in this post), and back
> then, paludis didn't handle binpkgs at all, let alone have anything as
> useful as portage's tar.bz2-with-some-extra-metadata-tacked-on binpkg
> format, so regardless of paludis' other features, there was simply no way
> I could seriously consider it. Maybe that has changed by now?
i don't know of that option being supported. i currently use the 0.24.6 from
august and that don't seem to list that feature. what does that feature in
portage?!
i'm using paludis for a speed reason. portage is really really slow and it
makes you die before determining deps. it's awful in that terms. i foud out
paludis which has a great speed and that seems to give a lot of debug infos
and that has a more modular approach when compared to portage. the last
useful thing is that i with portage i used to get some times compilation
errors that would go away when resuming; this thing don't happen almost
anytime with paludis. the only thing is that you'll have to install the
hooks or you risk doing some damage to the world db by deleting something
like some baselayout files when updating baselayout. that was some file
linking problem fixed when installing the collision protect hook.
but the function that i think is the best of paludis is the repositories:
you can administrate your layouts in a very good way and have a different
configuration for the various repos packages.
--
> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
>
> --
> gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
dott. ing. beso
------=_Part_6648_7933409.1192786613640
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/10/19, Duncan <<a href="mailto:1i5t5.duncan@cox.net">1i5t5.duncan@cox.net</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Beso <<a href="mailto:givemesugarr@gmail.com">givemesugarr@gmail.com</a>> posted<br><a href="mailto:d257c3560710180732t6d270ca1pec4697ea7fc5817a@mail.gmail.com">d257c3560710180732t6d270ca1pec4697ea7fc5817a@mail.gmail.com
</a>, excerpted<br>below, on Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:32:11 +0200:<br><br>> i recompiled gcc and used portage and that worked. i think that mine is<br>> a paludis bug. i'll post the bug on the paludis bugzilla. thanks for
<br>> your help anyway.<br><br>Thanks for the fix report. You may be right. I've not used paludis.<br><br>Talking about which... does paludis have proper binary package support<br>yet? That's the main reason I hadn't tried it back some time ago (when
<br>ciaranm was still a Gentoo dev, IIRC). Portage's FEATURES=buildpkg is my<br>favorite underdocumented power-user portage feature (for all sorts of<br>reasons I could detail but don't really belong in this post), and back
<br>then, paludis didn't handle binpkgs at all, let alone have anything as<br>useful as portage's tar.bz2-with-some-extra-metadata-tacked-on binpkg<br>format, so regardless of paludis' other features, there was simply no way
<br>I could seriously consider it. Maybe that has changed by now?</blockquote><div><br>i don't know of that option being supported. i currently use the 0.24.6 from august and that don't seem to list that feature. what does that feature in portage?!
<br>i'm using paludis for a speed reason. portage is really really slow and it makes you die before determining deps. it's awful in that terms. i foud out paludis which has a great speed and that seems to give a lot of debug infos and that has a more modular approach when compared to portage. the last useful thing is that i with portage i used to get some times compilation errors that would go away when resuming; this thing don't happen almost anytime with paludis. the only thing is that you'll have to install the hooks or you risk doing some damage to the world db by deleting something like some baselayout files when updating baselayout. that was some file linking problem fixed when installing the collision protect hook.
<br>but the function that i think is the best of paludis is the repositories: you can administrate your layouts in a very good way and have a different configuration for the various repos packages.<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
--<br>Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.<br>"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --<br>and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman<br><br>--<br><a href="mailto:gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org">
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org</a> mailing list<br><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>dott. ing. beso
------=_Part_6648_7933409.1192786613640--
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list