* [gentoo-amd64] openoffice-bin 2.0 version @ 2005-11-05 19:36 sean 2005-11-05 19:43 ` Qian Qiao 2005-11-06 15:49 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan 0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: sean @ 2005-11-05 19:36 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-amd64 Looking in the openoffice-bin directory I see a listing for openoffice-bin-2.0.0.ebuild and it does have the amd64 listed as a keyword. However, whenever I do an emerge openoffice-bin the build process installs version 1.1.5. I did notice that the keyword for 1.1.5 is as follows, KEYWORDS="amd64 x86" and 2.0.0 is as KEYWORDS="~x86 ~amd64". If I recall the ~ means unstable/untested. Is this the reason, and is there a work around? I would actually rather build 2.0 but have been unable to clear the keyword for openoffice 2.0.0. Thanks Sean -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] openoffice-bin 2.0 version 2005-11-05 19:36 [gentoo-amd64] openoffice-bin 2.0 version sean @ 2005-11-05 19:43 ` Qian Qiao 2005-11-06 13:18 ` sean 2005-11-06 15:49 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan 1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Qian Qiao @ 2005-11-05 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-amd64 On 11/5/05, sean <rsh.lists@comcast.net> wrote: > Looking in the openoffice-bin directory I see a listing for > openoffice-bin-2.0.0.ebuild and it does have the amd64 listed as a keyword. > However, whenever I do an emerge openoffice-bin the build process > installs version 1.1.5. > > I did notice that the keyword for 1.1.5 is as follows, KEYWORDS="amd64 > x86" and 2.0.0 is as KEYWORDS="~x86 ~amd64". > > If I recall the ~ means unstable/untested. Is this the reason, and is > there a work around? > > I would actually rather build 2.0 but have been unable to clear the > keyword for openoffice 2.0.0. > Thanks > Sean The easiest way is to add "=app-office/openoffice-bin-2.0.0 ~amd64" in you /etc/portage/package.keywords file. -- Joe -- There are 3 kinds of people in the world: Those who can count, and those who can't. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] openoffice-bin 2.0 version 2005-11-05 19:43 ` Qian Qiao @ 2005-11-06 13:18 ` sean 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: sean @ 2005-11-06 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-amd64 Qian Qiao wrote: > On 11/5/05, sean <> wrote: > >>Looking in the openoffice-bin directory I see a listing for >>openoffice-bin-2.0.0.ebuild and it does have the amd64 listed as a keyword. >>However, whenever I do an emerge openoffice-bin the build process >>installs version 1.1.5. >> >>I did notice that the keyword for 1.1.5 is as follows, KEYWORDS="amd64 >>x86" and 2.0.0 is as KEYWORDS="~x86 ~amd64". >> >>If I recall the ~ means unstable/untested. Is this the reason, and is >>there a work around? >> >>I would actually rather build 2.0 but have been unable to clear the >>keyword for openoffice 2.0.0. >> Thanks >> Sean > > > The easiest way is to add "=app-office/openoffice-bin-2.0.0 ~amd64" in > you /etc/portage/package.keywords file. > Thank You. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-amd64] Re: openoffice-bin 2.0 version 2005-11-05 19:36 [gentoo-amd64] openoffice-bin 2.0 version sean 2005-11-05 19:43 ` Qian Qiao @ 2005-11-06 15:49 ` Duncan 1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Duncan @ 2005-11-06 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-amd64 sean posted <436D09CA.1000905@comcast.net>, excerpted below, on Sat, 05 Nov 2005 14:36:42 -0500: > Looking in the openoffice-bin directory I see a listing for > openoffice-bin-2.0.0.ebuild and it does have the amd64 listed as a keyword. > However, whenever I do an emerge openoffice-bin the build process > installs version 1.1.5. > > I did notice that the keyword for 1.1.5 is as follows, KEYWORDS="amd64 > x86" and 2.0.0 is as KEYWORDS="~x86 ~amd64". > > If I recall the ~ means unstable/untested. Is this the reason, and is > there a work around? > > I would actually rather build 2.0 but have been unable to clear the > keyword for openoffice 2.0.0. You already have an answer for this particular case, but nothing pointing you to information on how it actually works, so you can understand what's happening and why... All Gentoo users should read and understand the "Working with Gentoo" and "Working with Portage" portions of the Gentoo Handbook. The first part of the handbook is on installation, true, but that's not ALL there is to the handbook, and unfortunately, a lot of folks miss the parts of it that cover actually working with a live Gentoo system, including how portage works, which includes how keywords work, and the difference between ~arch (unstable) and arch (stable) keywords. Link to the Gentoo Handbook, AMD64 edition: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml Direct link to the handbook, part 2, Working with Gentoo: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml?part=2 Direct link to the handbook, part 3, Working with Portage: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-amd64.xml?part=3 (While I'm at it, of help for those setting up their network config, part 4, Gentoo Network Configuration.) Read and understand the handbook, and you'll be better equipped to make the decisions necessary to properly admin your Gentoo computer, including how to deal with keywords, the question at hand. Fail to read and understand what's so readily available, and you'll continue to have to post questions with "simple" answers, and won't be able to get the most out of your Gentoo system, because you don't understand the basics of how to configure it to fit your specific needs. In that case, you might as well choose a binary distribution, not bothering with all this compiling from source and customized configuration stuff, as that's what makes Gentoo different from the others, better, for those who wish that level of control over their own system. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-11-06 15:55 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-11-05 19:36 [gentoo-amd64] openoffice-bin 2.0 version sean 2005-11-05 19:43 ` Qian Qiao 2005-11-06 13:18 ` sean 2005-11-06 15:49 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox