Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn

[Benny Pedersen <me@junc.eu>]

Duncan skrev den 2014-08-09 16:58:

>> are gentoo users more smart then linkedin ?
> Looking at the links, most of them are to

linkedin should sanitice not to post invites on maillist, its simple to 
them to figure out not to

> http://www.linkedin.com/blink?simpleRedirect= [long-encoded-link]

that is the problem with bit.ly aswell it can be used in abuse :(

> Looks to me like some spammer figured out the encoding (probably
> something simple like base64) and that the redirect wasn't 
> linkedin-site-
> limited, thus allowing them to mask whatever link they wanted and hide
> behind linkedin's formerly not too terrible reputation, tho it's surely
> dropping fast due to the spammers now.

yep i would try to build a clamav logical signature, but then its me 
that would be unsubscribed, not the invite spammers, i begin to think i 
dont need linkedin anymore

linkedin even have a ipv6 only mx record, damm, gives warning in every 
postfix its a no go

its a error to make multiple mx hostnames, there should only be one mx 
pr destinatiion, unless its one of them is a backup mx

if three is dual stacked it should be all in one mx, not multiple, while 
this should only be enforced while not all hostnames is dual stacked ip

workaround for linkedin could be to have all mx be dual stacked or add 
another host ip from another mx host so all is stillo dual stacked not 
neseserly on hardware host pr mx hostname

> I've gotten a few of these via email (my lists are via newsgroup via
> gmane, so entirely separate app used) as well, and the tibdixious name
> looks familiar, but this is the first I've noticed the redirect-link.

with gmail one does not notice problems, that does not mean there is 
none, thats why i keep my own problems with gentoo :)