From: Karol Krizka <kkrizka@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 10:03:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ac342b0a0508011003686becfc@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2005.08.01.13.45.00.753382@cox.net>
On 8/1/05, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
> Jan Jitse Venselaar posted <200508011105.14688.janjitse@gmail.com>,
> excerpted below, on Mon, 01 Aug 2005 11:04:38 +0200:
>
> > As the reporter of the problem with nano, I'd like to make 1 correction to
> > this report: Recompiling nano and its depencies did not fix the crashes. It
> > just fixed the eating of the file.
>
> Thanks for the correction.
>
I am just compiling my amd64 laptop from stage1 again, but this time I
applied the patches right in the beginning. Nano seems to run fine so
far (in chroot), so how do you get the crashes? I tried searching as
mentioned in the abose post.
> > I did not recompile my entire system, but a crash of such a small and basic
> > app as nano made me not want to do this outside of a chroot, which I
> > currently do not have the means for.
>
> A rather good point. Of course, some of us like living on the edge <g>,
> but it's still something I'd not add as a dev, certainly not unless it was
> linked to some sort of local
> USE=this-might-kill-your-children-and-eat-their-flesh type of USE flag! <g>
>
> (OK, s/children/files/, s/their-flesh/your-disk/, but you get the point...)
>
> Never-the-less, I added the strings patch here, and have the new KDE 3.4.2
> stuff at least, compiled against it... Computing is my hobby; if I
> wanted something that would predictably "just work", I'd be doing TiVos or
> the like! Much of the fun is the occasional breakage in mysterious ways,
> never knowing quite when it'll happen, and the challenge of figuring out
> how to get back to a working system, again!
>
So if you wanted something to just work you would be running Linux on
TiVo? I think a intel computer would be better for that...
> --
> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman in
> http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2004/12/22/rms_interview.html
>
>
> --
> gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
Cheers,
Karol Krizka
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-01 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-23 14:48 [gentoo-amd64] x86_64 optimization patches for glibc Simon Strandman
2005-07-23 16:36 ` Allan Wang
2005-07-23 17:08 ` Simon Strandman
2005-07-23 17:30 ` Allan Wang
2005-07-23 18:11 ` Jared Lindsay
2005-07-23 18:19 ` Allan Wang
2005-07-27 10:09 ` netpython
2005-07-27 16:11 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-23 18:44 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Brian Litzinger
2005-07-25 22:24 ` Luke-Jr
2005-07-25 22:38 ` Olivier Crete
2005-07-26 15:40 ` Luke-Jr
2005-07-26 16:50 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-26 17:02 ` Raffaele BELARDI
2005-07-26 17:49 ` Michael Edwards
2005-07-26 18:42 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-27 0:05 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Sami Samhuri
2005-07-27 2:50 ` Matt Randolph
2005-07-26 2:54 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Brian Litzinger
2005-07-23 16:39 ` Sean Johnson
2005-07-23 22:15 ` Matt Randolph
2005-07-23 22:36 ` Matt Randolph
2005-07-24 1:47 ` Sean Johnson
2005-07-24 3:36 ` Matt Randolph
2005-07-24 5:36 ` Ian McCulloch
2005-07-24 7:42 ` Jared Lindsay
2005-07-24 14:35 ` Simon Strandman
2005-07-24 18:13 ` Jared Lindsay
2005-07-25 20:08 ` Jeremy Huddleston
2005-07-25 21:34 ` Simon Strandman
2005-07-25 22:00 ` Jared Lindsay
2005-07-31 14:24 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-31 14:56 ` Brian Hall
2005-07-31 16:23 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-31 17:42 ` Ben Skeggs
2005-07-31 18:46 ` Jared Lindsay
2005-07-31 18:52 ` Nuitari
2005-08-01 13:51 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-07-31 19:21 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Simon Strandman
2005-08-01 9:04 ` Jan Jitse Venselaar
2005-08-01 13:45 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-08-01 17:03 ` Karol Krizka [this message]
2005-08-02 10:21 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2005-08-02 19:41 ` Matt Randolph
2005-08-02 23:27 ` [gentoo-amd64] hijacked! :) television (was: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc.) Sami Samhuri
2005-08-04 2:28 ` Luke-Jr
2005-08-05 0:28 ` Sami Samhuri
2005-08-05 7:43 ` Arm Suwarnaratana
2005-08-09 10:29 ` [gentoo-amd64] Re: x86_64 optimization patches for glibc Simon Strandman
2005-07-26 17:40 ` [gentoo-amd64] " ardour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ac342b0a0508011003686becfc@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kkrizka@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox