From: "Kris Kersey (Augustus)" <augustus@linuxhardware.org>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Planning a new box - AMD Opteron or Intel Xeon?
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:39:14 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711121435560.10969@penguin.linuxhardware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711111503.13509.e0026053@student.tuwien.ac.at>
Because, at the time, that was the best available from both AMD and Intel.
Also, if I'm not mistaken, the prices were similar at the time. Notice
that I was careful to also do some core vs. core benchmarks so that you
could possibly compare dual-core Xeons and look forward to Barcelona.
Thanks,
Kris Kersey (Augustus)
LinuxHardware.org Site Manager
augustus@linuxhardware.org
Gentoo Linux AMD64 Developer
augustus@gentoo.org
AIM: Augustus22
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007, Bernhard Auzinger wrote:
> Am Samstag 10 November 2007 schrieb Kris Kersey (Augustus):
>> Conway,
>>
>> While it doesn't include Barcelona, you probably would find my review on
>> LinuxHardware.org very useful in your decision making process. It
>> included the latest Xeon and Opteron processors using Tyan boards. Here's
>> the link:
>> http://www.linuxhardware.org/article.pl?sid=07/04/05/1414204&mode=thread
>>
>> If you have any other questions, I'll be happy to help.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kris Kersey (Augustus)
>> LinuxHardware.org Site Manager
>> augustus@linuxhardware.org
>> Gentoo Linux AMD64 Developer
>> augustus@gentoo.org
>> AIM: Augustus22
>
> Why do you compare two systems with a different number of cores? 2x2Core
> athlon64 versus 2x4Core Core2Duo.
>
> Rgds
> Bernhard
> --
> gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-12 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-10 15:11 [gentoo-amd64] Planning a new box - AMD Opteron or Intel Xeon? Conway S. Smith
2007-11-10 16:28 ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-10 16:52 ` Conway S. Smith
2007-11-10 17:43 ` Beso
2007-11-11 12:38 ` Conway S. Smith
2007-11-11 13:23 ` Beso
2007-11-12 1:43 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2007-11-12 2:55 ` Conway S. Smith
2007-11-12 17:42 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Bob Sanders
2007-11-10 23:20 ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-11 14:03 ` Bernhard Auzinger
2007-11-12 1:50 ` Richard Freeman
2007-11-12 14:39 ` Kris Kersey (Augustus) [this message]
2007-11-10 17:22 ` P.V.Anthony
2007-11-10 23:21 ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-12 16:55 ` Bob Sanders
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0711121435560.10969@penguin.linuxhardware.org \
--to=augustus@linuxhardware.org \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox