public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kris Kersey (Augustus)" <augustus@linuxhardware.org>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Planning a new box - AMD Opteron or Intel Xeon?
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:20:01 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711102318460.26994@penguin.linuxhardware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071110095206.7a73544e@mandalor.homelinux.net>

I would have a Barcelona review up but AMD didn't come through this last 
time on review samples.  It is important to keep in mind that 32-bit 
Windows performance is a big difference than 64-bit Linux performance. 
Keep this in mind when looking at 99% of the reviews out there.

Thanks,
Kris Kersey (Augustus)
LinuxHardware.org Site Manager
augustus@linuxhardware.org
Gentoo Linux AMD64 Developer
augustus@gentoo.org
AIM: Augustus22

On Sat, 10 Nov 2007, Conway S. Smith wrote:

> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:28:01 +0000 (UTC)
> "Kris Kersey (Augustus)" <augustus@linuxhardware.org> wrote:
>> Conway,
>>
>> While it doesn't include Barcelona, you probably would find my review
>> on LinuxHardware.org very useful in your decision making process.  It
>> included the latest Xeon and Opteron processors using Tyan boards.
>> Here's the link:
>> http://www.linuxhardware.org/article.pl?sid=07/04/05/1414204&mode=thread
>>
>> If you have any other questions, I'll be happy to help.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kris Kersey (Augustus)
>> LinuxHardware.org Site Manager
>> augustus@linuxhardware.org
>> Gentoo Linux AMD64 Developer
>> augustus@gentoo.org
>> AIM: Augustus22
>>
>
> Nice article, thanks Kris!  I'm about to hit the sack (I work nights),
> so I've mostly just skimmed the performance section, and I'm rather
> pleasantly surprised.
>
> The Opterons are looking a lot better there than some of the other
> reviews I've been reading.  The impression I've had was that in terms
> of performance, Intel's had a significant lead since the Conroe came
> out; although AMD's Barcelona is starting to close the gap (although I
> had the impression Intel's Clovertown still leads).
>
>
> Thanks,
> Conway S. Smith
>
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-11-10 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-10 15:11 [gentoo-amd64] Planning a new box - AMD Opteron or Intel Xeon? Conway S. Smith
2007-11-10 16:28 ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-10 16:52   ` Conway S. Smith
2007-11-10 17:43     ` Beso
2007-11-11 12:38       ` Conway S. Smith
2007-11-11 13:23         ` Beso
2007-11-12  1:43         ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2007-11-12  2:55           ` Conway S. Smith
2007-11-12 17:42         ` [gentoo-amd64] " Bob Sanders
2007-11-10 23:20     ` Kris Kersey (Augustus) [this message]
2007-11-11 14:03   ` Bernhard Auzinger
2007-11-12  1:50     ` Richard Freeman
2007-11-12 14:39     ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-10 17:22 ` P.V.Anthony
2007-11-10 23:21   ` Kris Kersey (Augustus)
2007-11-12 16:55     ` Bob Sanders

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0711102318460.26994@penguin.linuxhardware.org \
    --to=augustus@linuxhardware.org \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox