Re: [gentoo-amd64] Looks like I broke libc

[Nuitari <nuitari@melchior.nuitari.net>]

>> Yay.  Somewhere in the course of normal compiling, I've managed to hork
>> something up.  I run a plain amd64 system, and usually don't do anything
>> funny outside of the stable packages unless I need to.  It appears I've
>> broken my glibc installation:
>>
>> configure:2289: checking for C compiler default output file name
>> configure:2292: gcc -march=athlon64 -O2 -pipe   conftest.c  >&5
>> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.6/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
>> skipping incompatible /lib/libc.so.6 when searching for /lib/libc.so.6
>> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.6/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
>> cannot find /lib/libc.so.6
>
> That sounds... bad ;) I cannot offer you any ideas on how that
> happened (did you check if /lib/libc.so.6 is present?), but I can
> offer you a quickpkg of my glibc:
> http://alcaline.gotdns.com/gentoo/glibc-2.3.6-r4.tbz2
>
> Hope that helps.

I had a similar problem once when I had x86 crossdev running. Removing it 
(and associated packages) and getting a quickpkg of glibc of a similar 
machine fixed it. The 32 bit version of libc got put at the same place 
then the 64 bit one.
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list