From: Nuitari <nuitari@melchior.nuitari.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] initrd
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 15:32:49 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0510301532220.4212@melchior.nuitari.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200510301324.30816.xcourse97@charter.net>
I finally switched my only grub system to lilo yesterday.
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, William Tetrault wrote:
> Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 13:24:30 -0600
> From: William Tetrault <xcourse97@charter.net>
> Reply-To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
> To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] initrd
>
> I too have been on the amd64 platform since early last year, and am still
> using grub-static, although I know that grub now compiles fine for this
> platform (at least, that is what I've heard - I'm still using grub-static).
> But whether one uses grub or grub-static, the installed files are the same,
> and grub works the same regardless of which is chosen. My grub.conf has not
> changed from when I was using Athlon XP's (although it's no longer called
> grub.lst).
>
> On Sunday 30 October 2005 12:07 pm, Dmitri Pogosyan wrote:
>> Actually, that reminds me that a year ago on amd64 architecture the
>> compiled grub did not work for me (it did compile but fail to boot) and I
>> had to use grub-static-0.93, which worked fine. I looked now and see that
>> I still use this version of grub on all my amd64 machines.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dmitri Pogosyan Department of Physics
>> Associate Professor University of Alberta
>> tel 1-780-492-2150 412 Avadh Bhatia Physics Labs
>> fax 1-780-492-0714 Edmonton, AB, T6G 2J1, CANADA
>
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-30 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-30 18:07 [gentoo-amd64] initrd Dmitri Pogosyan
2005-10-30 19:24 ` William Tetrault
2005-10-30 20:32 ` Nuitari [this message]
2005-10-31 9:52 ` DR GM SEDDON
2005-10-31 13:43 ` DR GM SEDDON
2005-10-31 16:39 ` Drake Donahue
2005-11-01 14:45 ` DR GM SEDDON
2005-11-01 17:31 ` Drake Donahue
2005-11-01 18:06 ` Drake Donahue
2005-11-02 12:38 ` DR GM SEDDON
2005-11-02 13:14 ` Harm Geerts
2005-10-31 9:47 ` DR GM SEDDON
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-10-31 0:56 Dmitri Pogosyan
2005-10-30 15:59 Dmitri Pogosyan
2005-10-30 15:59 Dmitri Pogosyan
2005-10-30 17:35 ` Karol Krizka
2005-10-31 9:33 ` DR GM SEDDON
2005-10-29 23:54 Dmitri Pogosyan
2005-10-29 23:49 Dmitri Pogosyan
2005-10-28 16:19 Dmitri Pogosyan
2005-10-29 6:12 ` Lee Thompson
2005-10-29 13:21 ` DR GM SEDDON
2005-10-29 13:29 ` Craig Webster
2005-10-29 14:16 ` DR GM SEDDON
2005-10-29 15:41 ` Karol Krizka
2005-10-30 9:48 ` DR GM SEDDON
2005-10-30 15:45 ` Karol Krizka
2005-10-30 17:38 ` William Tetrault
2005-10-29 16:40 ` Drake Donahue
2005-10-29 18:12 ` Drake Donahue
2005-10-29 17:15 ` William Tetrault
2005-10-31 1:23 ` bruce harding
2005-10-28 14:13 DR GM SEDDON
2005-10-28 14:54 ` Mark Knecht
2005-10-29 15:36 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0510301532220.4212@melchior.nuitari.net \
--to=nuitari@melchior.nuitari.net \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox