From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AF51381FA for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D53BBE0923; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:41:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-f42.google.com (mail-pb0-f42.google.com [209.85.160.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 181B6E08E0 for ; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 16:41:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id md12so7214674pbc.15 for ; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 09:41:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vhensDA2riHndZqlM3XfsD9fxb59/Y+7DNhgR8h4NHs=; b=Jx+Hx9CLUjdI4WwsUhRrmMHNGGNZJ26iKpm/dtZcDFlG1ateN9furSbdNuIQ51W8x8 ktiCa1VSmwf5DcsmNj4szY8vEr9Pl+IFU+UIxOGGxN8ajL2tmKzcTGmm0Wv2dpNm88SC 9GqBcPE/wbNs51HD1IUwWmfaMs19QPNM5/fg/3BORrKdKTNXduH3/fyLt09xNzVjz1XB OXsHzG7S5ilW1ZeQw7eNCE+s2I5IZwGpL0UZOy8efR3vO/RwdavkxcAqe1ypBxj4g75F HULUHvAr68g5hXsdYTg+eFDIvjp2E1vHm2YGhqLi3V3nFs4Gq3GatmCqNCWgdKZ52WHk QwXQ== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.231.7 with SMTP id tc7mr65472815pbc.32.1401900090895; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 09:41:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.25.99 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jun 2014 09:41:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20140527223938.GA3701@sgi.com> <53859043.2050303@thegeezer.net> <20140528223247.66fff7d5@marcec> <20140529195707.3fddb0a0@marcec> <20140529170526.2e35807f7959d11f45f2de1c@comcast.net> Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 09:41:30 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] amd64 list, still useful? Was: btrfs From: Mark Knecht To: Gentoo AMD64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 7a07af32-099e-43ed-b59b-40abc5bb0f68 X-Archives-Hash: 855751af6d41188b87915ed7bb0cbdee On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > Meanwhile, Mark's reason for staying on this list, as opposed to the > general user list, are more or less mine, as well. > > Rather, in my case it is more that I remember the high traffic of the > user list and kind of like the lower but perhaps higher quality traffic > here, tho at times it's /too/ low traffic, these days. Probably at some > point I'll get back to the user list, but if this list were to shut down, > I'd still miss it, because while there's not a lot of traffic here these > days, the signal to noise ratio really is about the highest I can imagine. > > -- > Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. > "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- > and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman Hi Duncan, There is an in progress, higher energy thread on gentoo-user with folks getting upset (my interpretation) about systemd and support for suspend/resume features. I only found it being that I ran into an emerge block and went looking for a solution. (In my case it was -upower as a new use flag setting.) Anyway, I prefer it here. If I was reading that thread real-time I know I'd be responding to a few things even though I don't have anything of much value to add. It's just my nature in the presence of threads like that! ;-) Cheers, Mark P.S. - BTW - I love your long answers although I seldom have time to read them when they arrive. Stay true. They are of value.