public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo AMD64 <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Libjpeg-Turbo Drops Newer ABIs
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 11:40:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK2H+edseuJpuhwh0ndB=sJGH2TAV9UR4JNP9PKuyn2XdByd8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130802134502.77231249f8d453dcd846063a@comcast.net>

On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net> wrote:
> Libjpeg-turbo has been the default jpeg image processor on Gentoo
> for some time now.  But when I updated my system recently, the latest
> (unstable) libjpeg-turbo-1.3.0-r2 seems to have taken a giant step
> backward.  Here is the Gentoo changelog for 1.3.0-r2:
>
> "Revert back to .so.62 with 2 functions backported from .so.8, namely
> jpeg_mem_dest() and jpeg_mem_src(). ABIs .so.7 and .so.8 are dead and
> shouldn't be used anywhere anymore."
>
> This sudden change required the re-emerge of a LOT of packages.
>
> I have not been able to find any background information on the
> reason for this change.  Does anyone know the story behind this
> elimination of the newer JPEG ABI's and the step back to .so.62?
> Has any functionality, such as lossless cropping, been affected?
>
> Frank Peters
>
>

Looking around a bit more I found this in an Ubuntu notice:

  * Update debian/copyright:
    - add RSA Data Security copyright (md5).

The rest looks fairly innocuous to me.

https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjpeg-turbo/+changelog

I didn't find anything in CERT.

- Mark


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-02 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-02 17:45 [gentoo-amd64] Libjpeg-Turbo Drops Newer ABIs Frank Peters
2013-08-02 18:02 ` Mark Knecht
2013-08-02 18:18   ` Canek Peláez Valdés
2013-08-02 18:22     ` Rich Freeman
2013-08-02 18:28       ` Mark Knecht
2013-08-02 18:58         ` Frank Peters
2013-08-02 19:17           ` Mark Knecht
2013-08-03  7:17         ` Sergey Popov
2013-08-02 18:24     ` Mark Knecht
2013-08-02 18:40 ` Mark Knecht [this message]
2013-08-02 18:50 ` Barry Schwartz
2013-08-02 19:06   ` Frank Peters
2013-08-02 19:31     ` Barry Schwartz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK2H+edseuJpuhwh0ndB=sJGH2TAV9UR4JNP9PKuyn2XdByd8Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=markknecht@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox