From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo AMD64 <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Soliciting new RAID ideas
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 16:32:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK2H+ec_ayxJMkpdOWCMr2yahgoLT60g3U+cPC_=O-WYv0RPag@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140527223938.GA3701@sgi.com>
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Bob Sanders <rsanders@sgi.com> wrote:
> Mark Knecht, mused, then expounded:
>> Hi all,
>> The list is quiet. Please excuse me waking it up. (Or trying to...) ;-)
>>
>> I'm at the point where I'm a few months from running out of disk
>> space on my RAID6 so I'm considering how to move forward. I thought
>> I'd check in here and get any ideas folks have. Thanks in advance.
>>
>
> Beware - if Adobe acroread is used, and you opt for a 3TB home
> directory, there is a chance it will not work. Or more specifically,
> acroread is still 32-bit. It's only something I've seen with the xfs
> filesystem. And Adobe has ignored it for approx. 3yrs now.
>
acroread isn't critical to me but it does get used now and then so
thanks for the heads-up.
<SNIP>
>
> RAID 1 is fine, RAID 10 is better, but comsumes 4 drives and SATA ports.
Humm...I suppose I might consider building a 4-drive 1TB RAID10 from
my existing 500GB RE3 drives, and then buy a couple of 2TB Red drives
and do a RAID1 for data storage. If I did that I'd end up with 6
drives in the box, 4 of them old, but old ain't necessarily bad. ;-)
However that forces me to manage what data goes where instead of just
a big, flat RAID1 which is going to be easy to live with. Still, it
would probably save some money.
<SNIP>
>
> If you change, do not use ZFS and possibly BTRFS if the system does not
> have ECC DRAM. A single, unnoticed, ECC error can corrupt the data pool
> and be written to the file system, which effectively renders it corrupt
> without a way to recover.
Thanks. No ECC and no real interest in doing anything very exotic.
>
> FWIW - a Synology DS414slim can hold 4 x 1TB WD Red NAS 2.5" drives and
> provide a boot of nfs or iSCSI to your VMs. The downside is the NAS box
> and drives would go for a bit north of $636. The upside is all your
> movies and VM files could move off your workstation and the workstation
> would still host the VMs via a mount of the NAS box.
>
NAS is an interesting idea. I'll do a little study but my initial
feeling is that it's more money than I really want to spend. Summer's
coming. Time for Margaritas!
Thanks,
Mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-27 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-27 22:13 [gentoo-amd64] Soliciting new RAID ideas Mark Knecht
2014-05-27 22:39 ` Bob Sanders
2014-05-27 22:58 ` Harry Holt
2014-05-27 23:38 ` thegeezer
2014-05-28 0:26 ` Rich Freeman
2014-05-28 3:12 ` [gentoo-amd64] btrfs Was: " Duncan
2014-05-28 7:29 ` thegeezer
2014-05-28 20:32 ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-29 6:41 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2014-05-29 17:57 ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-29 17:59 ` Rich Freeman
2014-05-29 18:25 ` Mark Knecht
2014-05-29 21:05 ` Frank Peters
2014-05-30 2:04 ` [gentoo-amd64] amd64 list, still useful? Was: btrfs Duncan
2014-05-30 2:44 ` Frank Peters
2014-05-30 6:25 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2014-06-04 16:41 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Mark Knecht
2014-06-05 2:00 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2014-06-05 18:59 ` Mark Knecht
2014-06-06 12:11 ` Duncan
[not found] ` <Alo71o01J1aVA4001lo9xP>
2014-06-06 17:07 ` Duncan
2014-05-27 23:32 ` Mark Knecht [this message]
2014-05-27 23:51 ` [gentoo-amd64] Soliciting new RAID ideas Marc Joliet
2014-05-28 15:26 ` Bob Sanders
2014-05-28 15:28 ` Bob Sanders
2014-05-28 16:10 ` Rich Freeman
2014-05-28 19:20 ` Marc Joliet
2014-05-28 19:56 ` Bob Sanders
2014-05-29 7:08 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2014-05-27 23:05 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Alex Alexander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAK2H+ec_ayxJMkpdOWCMr2yahgoLT60g3U+cPC_=O-WYv0RPag@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=markknecht@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox