From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BCDD1381FA for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 18:25:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F2B3CE0943; Thu, 29 May 2014 18:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-f52.google.com (mail-pb0-f52.google.com [209.85.160.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F2C4E08E8 for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 18:25:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f52.google.com with SMTP id rr13so776232pbb.25 for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 11:25:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=DZ1mItv68oC52jhhhrIY0axqlwK1RVi+HCluyDi6IGk=; b=nH7mN/4hPN9hYEf3eR9MJ0B9I5g9RyTzqswL5hnx2XvZgM3g61a58K3YKC7H2u0A97 grQ8so53Ad9phtO9Qr5Xe+H3CSCpGrHyHHJPuLpehtHwymXvA3NjQH9OLDqVU950AqgH S+FyE/Kl+ejTZVqictQ5B8OAboU9LAQxoAEgzrk5MS5USBxolOuI3UJyTMALE+qEH1gP O/E59ninyN9YmM6SBeFa5nj+WFtYMW9uaeQSmOfuFCBPcYhkIeBuu0KoV99S70kNn4pr NyPB34KAwjY5nnK5tuPP3byRkXScChU6WCqvkeVf71EbWHOyroE7OEuBJIkMap6xsHP+ xIdg== Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.240.5 with SMTP id vw5mr10874338pbc.113.1401387920565; Thu, 29 May 2014 11:25:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.25.99 with HTTP; Thu, 29 May 2014 11:25:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20140527223938.GA3701@sgi.com> <53859043.2050303@thegeezer.net> <20140528223247.66fff7d5@marcec> <20140529195707.3fddb0a0@marcec> Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 11:25:20 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: btrfs Was: Soliciting new RAID ideas From: Mark Knecht To: Gentoo AMD64 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Archives-Salt: 48a94a3a-29e8-4f5a-9dd2-57027e98d0a0 X-Archives-Hash: ac1b82bea063cf6b45329877c96d579d On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Marc Joliet wrote: >> Am Thu, 29 May 2014 06:41:14 +0000 (UTC) >> schrieb Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>: >>> Thanks. I was on the user list for a short time back in 2004 when I >>> first started with gentoo, but back then it was mostly x86, while my >>> interest was amd64, and the amd64 list was active enough back then that I >>> didn't really feel the need for the mostly x86 user list, so I >>> unsubscribed and never got around to subscribing again, when the amd64 >>> list traffic mostly dried up. But if it'll help people there... go right >>> ahead and link or repost. >> >> I ended up simply forwarding it, as opposed to bumping my inactive thread. > > When was the last time we actually had an amd64-specific discussion on > this list? Part of me wonders if the list ought to be retired. It > made a lot more sense back when amd64 was fairly experimental and > prone to fairly unique issues. I deleted my 32-bit chroot some time > ago. > > Rich > I completely understand your point but in my case, after about a decade ongentoo-user, I quit posting gentoo-user completely due to the attitudes of some folks there, flame posts, put-downs, etc. I have no idea how it is now but I have no real desire to go back there. The two things I really value about this list are the quality of posts as well as the very civil way folks treat each other. Just my 2 cents Cheers, Mark