<p dir="ltr">A ) building gcc without spp does not disable spp for other packages.<br>
B) spp is a good thing even for single user desktops.<br>
C) i hate long answers without useful content.<br>
D ) i hate the quoting of my phone.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">Am 17.06.2014 15:05 schrieb &quot;Frank Peters&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:frank.peters@comcast.net">frank.peters@comcast.net</a>&gt;:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 07:11:26 +0000 (UTC)<br>
Duncan &lt;<a href="mailto:1i5t5.duncan@cox.net">1i5t5.duncan@cox.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt;  If you want to disable the strong-but-not-all default when it<br>
&gt; comes in 4.9, OK, but I&#39;d suggest at least keeping this minimal threshold<br>
&gt; of protection, particularly since it /will/ be the default now and thus<br>
&gt; there should be if anything fewer problems with it than not.<br>
&gt;<br>
<br>
The problem with all Linux distributions, and not just Gentoo, is that<br>
they are directed toward a multi-user, networked environment.  As a<br>
consequence, they exhibit security and other features that generally<br>
make no sense whatsoever for a single-user desktop machine that optionally<br>
connects externally only with an ISP through a router/modem.<br>
<br>
I continually have configuration problems because of the need to<br>
work around the useless (vis-a-vis the single-user desktop) and<br>
myriad requirements of the multi-user, networked scenario.<br>
<br>
In the single-user, desktop environment, the probability of a buffer<br>
overflow &quot;attack&quot; is virtually nil, especially if one is highly selective<br>
about &quot;surfing&quot; the Internet and employing Internet software (which<br>
I am).<br>
<br>
There needs to be a Linux distribution or sub-distribution that caters<br>
to the needs of the single, desktop user, ensconced as he is within<br>
his private garret and far removed from the troubles of a massive<br>
network.  My system is configured in a way that is quite contrary<br>
to recommended Linux practice (for example I run only and always as the<br>
root superuser and have no need for file permissions) but yet it makes<br>
perfect sense for my situation.<br>
<br>
Are single desktop users that much of a minority?  I would hope not.<br>
<br>
Frank Peters<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>