From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PiasI-0005vF-6t for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:03:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0C26E0B0A for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E9A1C009 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 22:21:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwg12 with SMTP id 12so4322260bwg.40 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:21:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dDbO6AgDMek+NSA1DmzVhnFGoS7zT6fAuzVt9Ug/Fcw=; b=fHJVfBVZ72bgpzRSiy4lien5EUZwrYm0Ge+CikevHi6il7Piwv8XBcHEeBBwT2l21t M/YXQ8Tbv6ZXi64REENNsNzdbnj061H3u0fRb2R0+rOsTLXAxRZlMHXykP/xvBr6TqHM p7uKJc5pBWa9G5uyGmvb5+R6iwgIaulPjD1Rg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=VefE7QTeWRaM/XOLomxyJvpglxxN5hZR3vUvE+gxZfg0d8BLbBo9m2JF51fTmhkRTi gqQANDarfzSEQoHl9OKZP20ZhkcSn/LTdtDcLCPd7CjnsEgw9YlrgiVPBCejXZVVrgTY E1eWh0X6HNHFl5IVZL2MuSB5XUFAD3+m6jc9k= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.52.134 with SMTP id i6mr1831939bkg.36.1296166758444; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:19:18 -0800 (PST) Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.18.197 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 14:19:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 16:19:18 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7pvV3Y6w6aC-VgA-3MD9ATrRff0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] bug report help From: Paul Hartman To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: fa814151d55909ad95985ab6ea61a4c6 On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Fernando Boaglio wrote: > Hi, > > There is a recent update which broke my Java IDE (Eclipse - not from > portage) . > > I've seen this strange behavior in 2 different machines, both ADM64, but I'm > not sure which package should I inform to this error: > > > *** glibc detected *** /opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.23/bin/java: free(): invalid > pointer: 0x00000000456f30d0 *** > ======= Backtrace: ========= > /lib/libc.so.6(+0x783c6)[0x7f7c039593c6] > /opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.23/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so(+0x61b879)[0x7f7c0341a879] > /opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.23/jre/lib/amd64/server/libjvm.so(+0x43d44f)[0x7f7c0323c44f] > /home/fb/eclipseWTP3.2.3/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/151/1/.cp/libswt-pi-gtk-3657.so(Java_org_eclipse_swt_internal_gtk_OS__1g_1data_1input_1stream_1read_1line+0xe7)[0x7f7bf5267d04] > [0x7f7bfebeaca8] > Is it glibc ? glibc is reporting to you about the error, FYI you can control its behavior (ignore, warn, abort) with the MALLOC_CHECK_ variable. See "man malloc" and scroll to the last paragraph. Maybe running as root operated under a different malloc mode? Looks like maybe your file /home/fb/eclipseWTP3.2.3/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/151/1/.cp/libswt-pi-gtk-3657.so is the common thread... I think the only way to really know exactly where it's crashing is to build everything involved with debug symbols and debug the coredump or use valgrind or something like that. If Eclipse is a binary install then I guess report it to whoever makes it (I don't know anything about Java or Eclipse).