From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1PBZfY-0003IV-1B for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:05:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F0BDE0C27 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com (mail-ww0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F06FE07A8 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb31 with SMTP id 31so2367654wwb.10 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:49:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:received :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SgAX4v2FZVcJnuSyD87n+5Wi8UPdZPNIS5+BBNsZTB8=; b=ThBrU9yB7RgBd3WYxta6JSZ+qhzZ7K0PI6lCzPgJ8qdhUYNRZ3Xbae/Xpf7iMIa5+q g2X1zjO2cjuth+zX8ys4UHXDxlCXeHOY3LNAeKDNJWno5A8h94BHX+AUXwSONEN8EsFY JY8is1bX5730KsGkVGuqIR+9eOiNHlBfByVhw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=FJbGFmJDrcf4biuaLvE0bU0T0z3riBrUyZIgp4dvFyNoo+IoFZRVS7r1toMEGuA+fH JdoXUehc8wTbekcMQcGgBeInGBsDeDYnaYgEprc7wVK4BWni/yg/RbRD4v9PbHbdVYsO nYyBGOsT5CQ5rYk7r3RyAi2UXEfQJhDrpaCJ0= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.7.205 with SMTP id 55mr691279wep.96.1288298945782; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.27.5 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:49:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.27.5 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:49:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CA21FE9.3010203@yahoo.com.br> Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 07:49:05 +1100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: intel processors x gentoo From: Lie Ryan To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d24f30723640493b3792f X-Archives-Salt: 315e8118-e48f-48ba-b284-435836ae7bf9 X-Archives-Hash: c340ff4acc480ce3e8822c30c9b39e94 --0016364d24f30723640493b3792f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 (Sorry for the top post, this brain dead email software in my mobile phone does not even allow me to remove the quoted message, and sorry for the previous garbled message, this email software is really brain dead) I was under the impression that i7 was 32bit (I guess I still unconsciously makes the relation that intel means 32bit). I guess I was wrong. > > On 28 Oct 2010 15:03, "Duncan" <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > > Lie Ryan posted on Thu, 28 Oct... > > > > On 09/29/10 03:03, Zhu Sha Zang wrote: >> I have some machines running gentoo and every machine... > > Why not? > > That statement implies that you don't either don't understand what > keywords are ... --0016364d24f30723640493b3792f Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

(Sorry for the top post, this brain dead email software in my mobile phone does not even allow me to remove the quoted message, and sorry for the previous garbled message, this email software is really brain dead)

I was under the impression that i7 was 32bit (I guess I still unconsciously makes the relation that intel means 32bit). I guess I was wrong.


>
> On 28 Oct 2010 15:03, "Duncan" <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote:
>
> Lie Ryan posted on Thu, 28 Oct...

>
>
> > On 09/29/10 03:03, Zhu Sha Zang wrote:

>> I have some machines running gentoo and every machine...


>
> Why not?
>
> That statement implies that you don't either don't understand what
> keywords are ...

--0016364d24f30723640493b3792f--