From: Harry Holt <harryholt@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] About to install on a 64 bit system. Advice wanted.
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 15:09:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikjSbPGHKo_DEm=uttrV7BP92ErOp7UEpP3baBx@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101209140138.aaa17006.frank.peters@comcast.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2003 bytes --]
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net>wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 04:04:50 +1100
> Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > What's the advantage of LILO nowadays? I used grub because of two
> > reasons: 1) I don't need to re-install the MBR when changing grub's
> > .conf file and 2) I can edit configuration at boot time, useful when
> > you messed up your grub.conf. Last time I checked (admittedly long
> > time ago) LILO cannot do both of these. Granted, I've never used LILO,
> > does it boot faster or runs on more platforms or is there any
> > particular reason why you used it?
> >
>
> For one thing, it is completely independent of the kernel and some
> were expressing concerns about compatibility with 64-bit.
>
> Lilo is also simpler, but it is not as versatile as grub.
>
> My point is not that lilo is an advantage, but that it should not
> be overlooked by those who may not require a complex set-up.
> The trend seems to be to trash everything in favour of grub.
>
> The legacy boot method is being slowly eliminated and will be
> replaced by EFI. For this there is elilo, which I hope to be
> using.
>
> Frank Peters
>
>
Yes, simplicity is why I have continued to stick with lilo (since 1995). It
just always has worked. There's nothing more frustrating for me than trying
to boot a machine and being presented with a
grub >
and having no clue what went wrong or where to go (although, yes, that's
because of experience with lilo - and lack of it with grub). I did try to
use grub for a time when it became popular, but after my first experience
with it trying to recover from a failed boot I gave up.
The main advantage to me - why I started using it - was that it plays well
with the Windows loader. I don't do those kind of dual-boot machines
anymore, but it was very convenient being able to recover a Windows boot
manager - or install a new one - and all I had to do to get back to my Linux
boot was edit the BOOT.INI file.
... HH
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2554 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-09 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-08 21:17 [gentoo-amd64] About to install on a 64 bit system. Advice wanted Dale
2010-12-08 22:23 ` Mark Knecht
2010-12-09 0:04 ` Dale
2010-12-09 2:13 ` Stan Sander
2010-12-09 4:51 ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 5:32 ` Dale
2010-12-09 7:42 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 16:28 ` Dale
2010-12-09 19:55 ` Duncan
2010-12-09 5:13 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Dale
2010-12-09 8:53 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-12-09 10:04 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 15:19 ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 16:37 ` Dale
2010-12-09 17:37 ` Harry Holt
2010-12-09 18:40 ` Dale
2010-12-09 16:39 ` Dale
2010-12-09 15:22 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Stan Sander
2010-12-09 16:42 ` Dale
2010-12-09 8:48 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-12-09 15:48 ` Dale
2010-12-10 12:09 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-12-08 22:58 ` Mateusz Arkadiusz Mierzwinski
2010-12-09 0:08 ` Dale
2010-12-08 23:03 ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 0:26 ` Dale
2010-12-09 1:13 ` Mateusz Arkadiusz Mierzwinski
2010-12-09 5:29 ` Dale
2010-12-09 9:48 ` Florian Philipp
2010-12-09 11:43 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 16:47 ` Dale
2010-12-09 11:58 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Paul Jewell
2010-12-09 14:09 ` Mateusz Arkadiusz Mierzwinski
2010-12-09 15:13 ` Mark Knecht
2010-12-09 16:53 ` Dale
2010-12-09 20:22 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 14:52 ` [gentoo-amd64] " J. Roeleveld
2010-12-09 16:55 ` Dale
2010-12-09 18:03 ` Mark Knecht
2010-12-10 12:34 ` Alex Alexander
2010-12-11 2:12 ` Dale
2010-12-09 15:27 ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 16:26 ` Harry Holt
2010-12-09 17:04 ` Lie Ryan
2010-12-09 19:01 ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 20:09 ` Harry Holt [this message]
2010-12-09 1:17 ` Mark Knecht
2010-12-09 1:54 ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 4:41 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 5:18 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Dale
2010-12-09 6:55 ` Thomas M
2010-12-09 7:26 ` Dale
2010-12-09 9:36 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 4:13 ` Duncan
2010-12-09 6:11 ` Dale
2010-12-09 11:10 ` Duncan
2010-12-09 15:36 ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 20:05 ` Duncan
2010-12-09 23:22 ` Dale
2010-12-10 12:54 ` Thanasis
2010-12-10 22:48 ` Duncan
2010-12-09 2:27 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Alex Schuster
2010-12-09 5:21 ` Dale
2010-12-09 9:33 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 10:12 ` Florian Philipp
2010-12-09 11:18 ` Duncan
2010-12-09 17:03 ` Dale
2010-12-09 20:33 ` Duncan
2010-12-09 21:45 ` Alex Schuster
2010-12-09 23:28 ` Dale
2010-12-10 11:59 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-12-10 13:16 ` Dale
2010-12-09 10:06 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Stefan G. Weichinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTikjSbPGHKo_DEm=uttrV7BP92ErOp7UEpP3baBx@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=harryholt@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox