From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-amd64+bounces-12688-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1P0GB9-0007sw-VY
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:03:48 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 216E7E095C
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:03:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBF9E07B6
	for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:13:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm14 with SMTP id 14so4549963fxm.40
        for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received
         :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=Nkcsk4TXy90r/l5zU09kM+uXn3EHJgMGXavtrqqakik=;
        b=gYWlHQcf7gNhMIooV658Mr1GP0HXYNTjNY3QMDUt3mdPTc9b+Ih8XlroAYFhMta3+w
         lHqCCtkTklRKvKLgq2JdoORzJQOHMFOlLCiYYfTdlNEPCs2dhSpeZaJ5n8nU+uv1n6a2
         g3dc5WsUApG0voU8YFzC9td2aLegz1bUk8Ggw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=Xo0rBzHlyA1Ua42x5RnT9pfZNwweSazAXn5ICFCrB7XljwhaZW6h+F/uZLtHgwoS3c
         DGCGKtYgE/Lcr4yzGxvjLMLSd8z6OUHWuM/PQjBuShuPVWEvrOB9GhwqH1Q3/Cl7BbSt
         jPHofaFa/s54fvLGnSaDl642MrYZJMQfCkA+A=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-amd64.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.239.181.211 with SMTP id n19mr567037hbg.102.1285600422317;
 Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: paul.hartman@gmail.com
Received: by 10.239.160.1 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:13:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <op.vjoyhwdsvnz6gd@pc2.homenet>
References: <op.vjoyhwdsvnz6gd@pc2.homenet>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:13:42 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: KxPsw6auhnS8Qz3JFPKlLH7tTUc
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=OXXg=Mi2eXF2kN83jAyLhDAXOoMQ9Ko+C1Edj@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] glibc-2.12.1-r1 failure
From: Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Archives-Salt: 6a833023-9fea-4bc9-8591-92a12ad71459
X-Archives-Hash: b25b9ad0ac18ba013cc1256b1ddcb415

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Paul Stear <gentoo@appjaws.plus.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> I think I have a symbolic link problem. Any thought on how to solve this
> error.
...
> unexpected reloc type in static binarymake[1]: *** [install-symbolic-link]
...
> LDFLAGS="-Wl,--as-needed,-O1 -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -Wl,--sort-common -s"

See this forum post:

http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-6395405.html

Seems your LDFLAGS may be the culprint. Specifically this part of
ssuominen's post:

quote:
-Wl,-s (or plain -s) breaks Portage's strip handling,
FEATURES="nostrip", FEATURES="-nostrip". Also, toolchain packages,
exactly like glibc handles stripping in very selective way -> Some of
the installed binaries/libraries *can* be stripped, and some *cannot*.
Just forcing stripping for everything is... like I said, insane