From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1P0jDl-000349-BR for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:04:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A69C2E073C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:04:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF27CE060D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm18 with SMTP id 18so134270fxm.40 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:15:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=o5XNw6IKXsxh+kNbtarnQ99jqeu8QZgbfrLqQB/RtBg=; b=hkjyYwm1FnH5HMRwJgYP18XNvFmTHuhleGMNVuXjwraS4jInze2+DXV+XT0V7HJKwv cj5b//kk9PUHzSPctmARLXyGzSnsiKTOz80HbijVApkqYuVwARRJJ2QG4wNpF0FJr5Lr PwhetEhCDOaVNqbT4niKYmI9LDxIlbcltq2Kg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=N5yEiIky+CSkuCOIA1ttzDAMHdQzY0nZbxSsQtw4co/TJWobI8FnH6UZyWSj9CyqaD Ofz9ZrCdgBcLYox+cBK/0i0jOCizvIS/v1cKTKo++OqlGq9GVeKII5d97VfBWGVG4mwF na7/vsTcH32seVNfW6dQRHhWgIT1KsUmOPs9c= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.115.206 with SMTP id j14mr795349faq.28.1285712154759; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.113.17 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:15:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CA24400.6010204@yahoo.com.br> References: <4CA21FE9.3010203@yahoo.com.br> <4CA24400.6010204@yahoo.com.br> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:15:54 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] intel processors x gentoo From: malc To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5bc6544caf204915930e9 X-Archives-Salt: 7240760c-587e-43c8-ac01-2ae9bb5ca95c X-Archives-Hash: cf96a926e28a03aa5df231f24c43b398 --001636c5bc6544caf204915930e9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 For the quad2core log, check you're using the latest binutils (binutils-config -l ; ld -v) looks like you're picking up an older version (2.18) which previously caused this issue (though apparently patched) in http://bugs.gentoo.org/333541 Cheers, malc. On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Zhu Sha Zang wrote: > Em 28-09-2010 15:55, Fernando Boaglio escreveu: > > > My desktop is a AMD Phenom Quad and my (newer) laptop is a Intel Core i3, > they share the same /etc/make.conf and everything compiled fine. > > What is your compilation error? > > []'s > Fernando Boaglio > > > build.log in attachment... > > --001636c5bc6544caf204915930e9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable For the quad2core log, check you're using the latest binutils (binutils= -config -l ; ld -v) looks like you're picking up an older version (2.18= ) which previously caused this issue (though apparently patched) in=A0http://bugs.gentoo.org/333541

Cheers,
malc.

O= n Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Zhu Sha Zang <zhushazang@yahoo.com.br> = wrote:
=20 =20 =20
Em 28-09-2010 15:55, Fernando Boaglio escreveu:

My desktop is a AMD Phenom Quad and my (newer) laptop is a Intel Core i3, they share the same /etc/make.conf and everything compiled fine.

What is your compilation error?

[]'s
Fernando Boaglio

build.log in attachment...


--001636c5bc6544caf204915930e9--