From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-amd64+bounces-12109-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1N7saN-0007fK-Jf
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:24:51 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFF71E0698;
	Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:24:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pw0-f47.google.com (mail-pw0-f47.google.com [209.85.160.47])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF23E0698
	for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:24:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pwi9 with SMTP id 9so69842pwi.26
        for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:24:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type;
        bh=P23+16LTauANXRf6K2/OCstbPvm97tAOItSGsNiSN1w=;
        b=VG/qczdpkGFeL71yPZUB+FciKY2UUEkAx9Ml87Hdd/xhMkW7++F2wGjvebb6ajb2Kd
         8y8Ox7OJF+xxL5/9XofyA8LiEqdtPqtmJQ5IiO2yKdjvkUohEXVcWL/bdzCi/ZYFXggm
         iOpPF868G9KGLVrO611A6HLu2P4ihMS+JC2iA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=mPheyN9InMHSJgUomIJ4hz6qK32vMdle4XymzhU4OnvPhjFm+kv63cEY2lYCsn3Yn9
         VRL1W54OFMpRs2N5xe6xa/ZbFJZDX+SniCnLUgDg9plvQd4Ix/WqFyisoU7ulAps+I8h
         d0WySkc0MFluRpc3RM83ruiMh09VlimWPi/tI=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-amd64.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.59.16 with SMTP id h16mr21538wfa.161.1257866686142; Tue, 
	10 Nov 2009 07:24:46 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:24:46 -0800
Message-ID: <7a329d910911100724ldda3b51j1bc2e662a36141f2@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [gentoo-amd64] What happened to sun-jdk?
From: Wil Reichert <wil.reichert@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-amd64 <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Archives-Salt: 9527631b-16e6-4f47-87e2-18042184d310
X-Archives-Hash: 7f43cedc72c26eb92cd303e6e4e03707

Never seen a license block a package before:

$ emerge -p sun-jdk

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!

!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "dev-java/sun-jdk" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request:
- dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.17 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
A copy of the 'dlj-1.1' license is located at '/usr/portage/licenses/dlj-1.1'.

- dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.16 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
- dev-java/sun-jdk-1.6.0.15 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
- dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5.0.22 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
- dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5.0.21 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
- dev-java/sun-jdk-1.5.0.20 (masked by: dlj-1.1 license(s))
- dev-java/sun-jdk-1.4.2.19 (masked by: sun-bcla-java-vm license(s),
missing keyword)
A copy of the 'sun-bcla-java-vm' license is located at
'/usr/portage/licenses/sun-bcla-java-vm'.


For more information, see the MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge
man page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook.


Checked the package Changelog, briefly glanced at the license file,
checked the global package.mask, Gentoo web site, and the gentoo dev
blogs.  Unable to find any comment or explanation on why this
happened.  Anyone have an idea?

Wil