* [gentoo-amd64] why unmerge acpid ?
@ 2007-09-11 20:14 Thanasis
2007-09-11 20:33 ` Thanasis
2007-09-11 23:10 ` [gentoo-amd64] why unmerge acpid ? RESOLVED Thanasis
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thanasis @ 2007-09-11 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
uname -r
2.6.22-gentoo-r5
I have acpi in my USE flags and compiled support in kernel:
grep -i acpi .config |grep -v ^\#
CONFIG_ACPI=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_FS=y
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y
CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m
CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m
CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=m
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m
CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m
CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0
CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y
CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y
CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y
CONFIG_PNPACPI=y
CONFIG_ATA_ACPI=y
*BUT* , isn't acpid needed by some apps like gnome battery charge monitor?
Why does "emerge --update" suddenly want to remove sys-power/acpid?
Is there something else we are supposed to use, instead of sys-power/acpid?
Thanasis
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] why unmerge acpid ?
2007-09-11 20:14 [gentoo-amd64] why unmerge acpid ? Thanasis
@ 2007-09-11 20:33 ` Thanasis
2007-09-11 20:45 ` Olivier Crête
2007-09-11 23:10 ` [gentoo-amd64] why unmerge acpid ? RESOLVED Thanasis
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thanasis @ 2007-09-11 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
on 09/11/2007 11:14 PM Thanasis wrote the following:
> uname -r
> 2.6.22-gentoo-r5
>
> I have acpi in my USE flags and compiled support in kernel:
>
> grep -i acpi .config |grep -v ^\#
> CONFIG_ACPI=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_FS=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0
> CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y
> CONFIG_PNPACPI=y
> CONFIG_ATA_ACPI=y
>
> *BUT* , isn't acpid needed by some apps like gnome battery charge monitor?
> Why does "emerge --update" suddenly want to remove sys-power/acpid?
> Is there something else we are supposed to use, instead of sys-power/acpid?
>
> Thanasis
Actually I should be posting this to the *gentoo-user* list as this
system is a i686 Pentium III, but the same thing happens for a AMD64
machine too!
Thanasis
PS: Also, it's late here and I'm tired. Sorry :-[
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] why unmerge acpid ?
2007-09-11 20:33 ` Thanasis
@ 2007-09-11 20:45 ` Olivier Crête
2007-09-12 10:24 ` Wil Reichert
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Olivier Crête @ 2007-09-11 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1256 bytes --]
On Tue, 2007-11-09 at 23:33 +0300, Thanasis wrote:
> on 09/11/2007 11:14 PM Thanasis wrote the following:
> > uname -r
> > 2.6.22-gentoo-r5
> >
> > I have acpi in my USE flags and compiled support in kernel:
> >
> > grep -i acpi .config |grep -v ^\#
> > CONFIG_ACPI=y
> > CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y
> > CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_FS=y
> > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y
> > CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m
> > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m
> > CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=m
> > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m
> > CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m
> > CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0
> > CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y
> > CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y
> > CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y
> > CONFIG_PNPACPI=y
> > CONFIG_ATA_ACPI=y
> >
> > *BUT* , isn't acpid needed by some apps like gnome battery charge monitor?
> > Why does "emerge --update" suddenly want to remove sys-power/acpid?
> > Is there something else we are supposed to use, instead of sys-power/acpid?
> >
> > Thanasis
> Actually I should be posting this to the *gentoo-user* list as this
> system is a i686 Pentium III, but the same thing happens for a AMD64
> machine too!
>
> Thanasis
> PS: Also, it's late here and I'm tired. Sorry :-[
Last I checked, gnome-power-manager did not use acpid anymore
--
Olivier Crête
tester@gentoo.org
Gentoo Developer
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] why unmerge acpid ? RESOLVED
2007-09-11 20:14 [gentoo-amd64] why unmerge acpid ? Thanasis
2007-09-11 20:33 ` Thanasis
@ 2007-09-11 23:10 ` Thanasis
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thanasis @ 2007-09-11 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
on 09/11/2007 11:14 PM Thanasis wrote the following:
> uname -r
> 2.6.22-gentoo-r5
>
> I have acpi in my USE flags and compiled support in kernel:
>
> grep -i acpi .config |grep -v ^\#
> CONFIG_ACPI=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_FS=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m
> CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0
> CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y
> CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y
> CONFIG_PNPACPI=y
> CONFIG_ATA_ACPI=y
>
> *BUT* , isn't acpid needed by some apps like gnome battery charge monitor?
> Why does "emerge --update" suddenly want to remove sys-power/acpid?
> Is there something else we are supposed to use, instead of sys-power/acpid?
>
> Thanasis
>
>
Portage was correct.
I didn't need acpid as I had hald (hal) installed. I just needed to
start hald. :-)
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] why unmerge acpid ?
2007-09-11 20:45 ` Olivier Crête
@ 2007-09-12 10:24 ` Wil Reichert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Wil Reichert @ 2007-09-12 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
On 9/11/07, Olivier Crête <tester@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-09 at 23:33 +0300, Thanasis wrote:
> > on 09/11/2007 11:14 PM Thanasis wrote the following:
> > > uname -r
> > > 2.6.22-gentoo-r5
> > >
> > > I have acpi in my USE flags and compiled support in kernel:
> > >
> > > grep -i acpi .config |grep -v ^\#
> > > CONFIG_ACPI=y
> > > CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y
> > > CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_FS=y
> > > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS=y
> > > CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m
> > > CONFIG_ACPI_VIDEO=m
> > > CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=m
> > > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m
> > > CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m
> > > CONFIG_ACPI_BLACKLIST_YEAR=0
> > > CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y
> > > CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y
> > > CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y
> > > CONFIG_PNPACPI=y
> > > CONFIG_ATA_ACPI=y
> > >
> > > *BUT* , isn't acpid needed by some apps like gnome battery charge monitor?
> > > Why does "emerge --update" suddenly want to remove sys-power/acpid?
> > > Is there something else we are supposed to use, instead of sys-power/acpid?
> > >
> > > Thanasis
> > Actually I should be posting this to the *gentoo-user* list as this
> > system is a i686 Pentium III, but the same thing happens for a AMD64
> > machine too!
> >
> > Thanasis
> > PS: Also, it's late here and I'm tired. Sorry :-[
>
> Last I checked, gnome-power-manager did not use acpid anymore
>
> --
> Olivier Crête
> tester@gentoo.org
> Gentoo Developer
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't acpid more or less been
replaced by hald?
Wil
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-12 10:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-09-11 20:14 [gentoo-amd64] why unmerge acpid ? Thanasis
2007-09-11 20:33 ` Thanasis
2007-09-11 20:45 ` Olivier Crête
2007-09-12 10:24 ` Wil Reichert
2007-09-11 23:10 ` [gentoo-amd64] why unmerge acpid ? RESOLVED Thanasis
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox