From: "Wil Reichert" <wil.reichert@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Is there any difference with 4 core?
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:27:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a329d910708010827hdb47b65n67a0f0003181228e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46B0A3D5.6080203@singnet.com.sg>
On 8/1/07, P.V.Anthony <pvantony@singnet.com.sg> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Need some more advice.
>
> Now the question is, is it better to go with 2 core or 4 core?
>
> The reason for this question is, that I heard there is a diminishing
> return with more cores. Not sure if this is true with kernel 2.6.21 and
> running at 64bit.
>
> The server needed to built is for the following apps.
>
> Hardware.
> 1. Tyan Tank GT20 (B5191)
> 2. 2 x Sata drives
> 3. Software raid 1
> 4. 4Gb ram ecc
> 5. Intel Core2Duo E6420 or Intel Core2Quad E6600
>
> Apps.
> 1. Gentoo linux 64bit
> 2. Apache 2
> 3. MySql
> 4. Postgres
> 5. Qmail
> 6. Pure-ftpd
> 7. Mod_perl
> 8. php
> 9. ruby
>
> Will all the instances of the apps be shared among the cores?
>
> Please share the comments.
>
> I would really like to save some money. If the 2 core can do the job
> there is quite a bit of savings buying just the 2 core.
>
> The other option is just to go with Pentium D with 2 core. That one is a
> real saver.
>
> Please advice.
Whether a dual core will work well for your situation completely
depends on the load and usage patterns. Is this for a server or
development machine? Whatever you do, DO NOT buy a pentium 4 dual
core.
Wil
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-01 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-01 15:16 [gentoo-amd64] Is there any difference with 4 core? P.V.Anthony
2007-08-01 15:27 ` Wil Reichert [this message]
2007-08-01 15:41 ` P.V.Anthony
2007-08-01 15:44 ` Bob Sanders
2007-08-01 20:12 ` Martin Nielsen
2007-08-01 23:13 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2007-08-02 8:58 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Pascal BERTIN
2007-08-02 9:57 ` P.V.Anthony
2007-08-02 14:27 ` Bob Sanders
2007-08-03 2:36 ` P.V.Anthony
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708021008180.12943@thing.com>
2007-08-03 2:30 ` P.V.Anthony
2007-08-03 3:39 ` Nuitari
2007-08-03 4:05 ` P.V.Anthony
2007-08-03 14:23 ` Bob Sanders
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a329d910708010827hdb47b65n67a0f0003181228e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=wil.reichert@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox