[gentoo-amd64] Layman overlays site down?

[gentoo-amd64] Layman overlays site down?

[Peter Humphrey]

For the last couple of days I've been unable to connect to 
http://overlays.gentoo.org. Can anyone here say what its fate is? I'd quite 
like to get a copy of the vmware overlay.

-- 
Rgds
Peter.
Linux Counter 5290, Aug 93
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Layman overlays site down?

[Johan Andersson]

On 2007-07-19 21:48, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> For the last couple of days I've been unable to connect to 
> http://overlays.gentoo.org. Can anyone here say what its fate is? I'd quite 
> like to get a copy of the vmware overlay.
>
>   
working  from sweden ;D
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Layman overlays site down?

[Bernhard Auzinger]

Am Donnerstag 19 Juli 2007 schrieb Johan Andersson:
> On 2007-07-19 21:48, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > For the last couple of days I've been unable to connect to
> > http://overlays.gentoo.org. Can anyone here say what its fate is? I'd
> > quite like to get a copy of the vmware overlay.
>
> working  from sweden ;D

working from vienna :).

what about other websites in this area?

rgds
Bernhard
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Layman overlays site down?

[Wil Reichert]

On 7/19/07, Bernhard Auzinger <e0026053@student.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 19 Juli 2007 schrieb Johan Andersson:
> > On 2007-07-19 21:48, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > For the last couple of days I've been unable to connect to
> > > http://overlays.gentoo.org. Can anyone here say what its fate is? I'd
> > > quite like to get a copy of the vmware overlay.
> >
> > working  from sweden ;D
>
> working from vienna :).
>
> what about other websites in this area?
>

On a vaguely related topic - does anyone else have issues adding the
dberkholz overlay?  This has not worked for me for some time.

Wil
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Layman overlays site down?

[Christoph Mende]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 387 bytes --]

On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:48:32 +0100
Peter Humphrey <prh@gotadsl.co.uk> wrote:

> For the last couple of days I've been unable to connect to 
> http://overlays.gentoo.org. Can anyone here say what its fate is? I'd quite 
> like to get a copy of the vmware overlay.
> 
You can also just get it without layman:
svn co http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/vmware/trunk vmware-overlay

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Layman overlays site down?

[Peter Humphrey]

On Thursday 19 July 2007 21:31, Christoph Mende wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:48:32 +0100
> Peter Humphrey <prh@gotadsl.co.uk> wrote:
> > For the last couple of days I've been unable to connect to
> > http://overlays.gentoo.org. Can anyone here say what its fate is? I'd
> > quite like to get a copy of the vmware overlay.
>
> You can also just get it without layman:
> svn co http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/vmware/trunk vmware-overlay

That's the step that's failing. On further checking, I find that I have to set 
the client's destination port in ~/.subversion/servers, presumably for both 
me and root. Apparently svn doesn't use the transport protocol reserved for 
it in /etc/services, nor does the Gentoo version create an /etc/subversion 
directory for global settings.

Intuitive? I think not.

Thanks for the help.

-- 
Rgds
Peter.
Linux Counter 5290, Aug 93
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Layman overlays site down?

[Dustin J. Mitchell]

On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:18:37AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > svn co http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/vmware/trunk vmware-overlay
> 
> That's the step that's failing. On further checking, I find that I have to set 
> the client's destination port in ~/.subversion/servers, presumably for both 
> me and root. Apparently svn doesn't use the transport protocol reserved for 
> it in /etc/services, nor does the Gentoo version create an /etc/subversion 
> directory for global settings.

http:// URLs should run over port 80 unless specified otherwise.

If the server is using a different port, you should include that in the
URL.

Dustin
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Layman overlays site down?

[Peter Humphrey]

On Friday 20 July 2007 15:37, Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:18:37AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > svn co http://overlays.gentoo.org/svn/proj/vmware/trunk vmware-overlay
> >
> > That's the step that's failing. On further checking, I find that I have
> > to set the client's destination port in ~/.subversion/servers, presumably
> > for both me and root. Apparently svn doesn't use the transport protocol
> > reserved for it in /etc/services, nor does the Gentoo version create an
> > /etc/subversion directory for global settings.
>
> http:// URLs should run over port 80 unless specified otherwise.
>
> If the server is using a different port, you should include that in the
> URL.

You're right, of course. Strange how the obvious can stare one in the face and 
still not be seen. Now all I have to complain about is the way svn keeps its 
config data: why client data in server files, why no /etc/subversion 
directory. On second thoughts, I have bigger things to worry about.

-- 
Rgds
Peter.
Linux Counter 5290, Aug 93
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list