From: "Ryan Sims" <rwsims@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: /lib32/* missing after system upgrade
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 18:15:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <64e8d2f20701091515i6fc1b696o6ae8ad6140593b9f@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200701092141.26431.harmgeerts@home.nl>
On 1/9/07, Harm Geerts <harmgeerts@home.nl> wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 January 2007 17:20, Ryan Sims wrote:
> > On 1/9/07, Piotr Jaroszyński <peper@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 09 January 2007 16:27, Einar S. Idsø wrote:
> > > > Some further info: I just remembered that I also changed the symlink
> > > > for /etc/make.profile. For some reason I changed it to point to
> > > > /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/x86/2006.0, which doesn't seem
> > > > right... I suppose I should rather have used
> > > > /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/amd64/2006.1/(desktop|server)?
> > > >
> > > > Did I just stupidly break my system?
> > >
> > > You have switched to non-multilib profile... Switch it back asap and
> > > reemerge whatever you emerged on invalid profile.
> >
> > Is that possible?
> >
> > from http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-amd64-faq.xml#multilib :
> > "Currently you cannot switch from a no-multilib to a multilib-enabled
> > profile, so think over your decision twice before you use the
> > no-multilib profile."
>
> The reason it's not possible is because it breaks the system.
> portage does not prevent you from changing to an incompatible profile.
Understood, I was thinking of "Switch it back asap and reemerge" as
impossible. I have a deep respect for portage, but I absolutely do
not expect it to protect me from myself ;)
--
Ryan W Sims
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-09 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-09 15:12 [gentoo-amd64] /lib32/* missing after system upgrade "Einar S. Idsø"
2007-01-09 15:27 ` "Einar S. Idsø"
2007-01-09 16:13 ` Piotr Jaroszyński
2007-01-09 16:20 ` Ryan Sims
2007-01-09 20:41 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Harm Geerts
2007-01-09 23:15 ` Ryan Sims [this message]
2007-01-11 9:19 ` Duncan
2007-01-09 17:07 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Simon Stelling
2007-01-09 18:42 ` "Einar S. Idsø"
2007-01-10 10:15 ` "Einar S. Idsø"
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=64e8d2f20701091515i6fc1b696o6ae8ad6140593b9f@mail.gmail.com \
--to=rwsims@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox