From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-amd64+bounces-11861-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Mh7aB-0001UM-8n
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 19:57:59 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6C5DEE0912
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 01:07:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yw0-f171.google.com (mail-yw0-f171.google.com [209.85.211.171])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65B0E095D
	for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:37:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ywh1 with SMTP id 1so4243038ywh.9
        for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=92hMXUspK1dAilyy2rjC13qiKHfhAOESW/cz056oBaI=;
        b=mS0ZymH4/9lSIsOrGIiL8xJlSwU65lg7UZyKklhSkd+2ZLCeBBYBDvTSZhmAnd96GX
         e8U6GrJQ7m1p7iFB+NUMlTCKCa1YKoeuV2E5Fk0DMAIYQdy+SA8e/hS7gHRmEdFGqGT4
         C0u0svJu44Nf5gXvtD8vkUF4p+AZycG+Eu1t0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=VEPPCRV3r5O0iYOpo7+h1yqrfWuQpvMLYzrZZc9KwfsriEaOxXCYqkf5UGtkOQuOQj
         s0SJAeVS7yoM2t2PbEKMyodulMVvAxDMhyXw6St77OdHa1abTX7Fl4TFCbK/LY320M4I
         otGmFIi5v+ZXz7yD/LNN6BCE4q4rx16GHolEA=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-amd64.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.237.15 with SMTP id k15mr10873728ybh.168.1251214674365; 
	Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:37:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4A940483.4050907@szalkai.net>
References: <4A93ED07.2040804@ercbroadband.org>
	 <5bdc1c8b0908250755r45f0ee98w5371d1d0391785e9@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4A93FCB3.1060105@szalkai.net>
	 <5bdc1c8b0908250807t70e75c70uab523b5f2df35b79@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4A940483.4050907@szalkai.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:37:54 -0700
Message-ID: <5bdc1c8b0908250837kf9ef180sf869d0df7735a792@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] KDE4.3 upgrade -- questions about wiki page
From: Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: a7430603-8a38-43ee-bdf5-e03d4f346d0f
X-Archives-Hash: f09c0bfdef9eb755b444fa6a86a24184

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Akos Szalkai<szalkai@szalkai.net> wrote:
>
>>> You may be thinking of autounmask. =C2=A0But I don't think it will help=
 with
>>> the KDE 4.2.4->4.3.0 blocks.
>>>
>> Yes, that's what I was thinking of.
>>
>> Why don't you think it will help in this case? Is it limited in some way=
?
> If I'm remember correctly (I don't have a KDE-4.2.4 system right now),
> the blocks are not keyword or mask related, but 4.2.4 and 4.3 simply
> blocking each other. =C2=A0You cannot have both installed, unless you tur=
n on
> the very much deprecated kdeprefix USE flag. =C2=A0And if you have a :4.2
> versioned item in world, portage won't be able to resolve the blocks by
> upgrading (which may or may not be considered a portage problem).
>
> At least this is how I imagine the situation, without digging too deep
> into the ebuilds. :-/
>
> Akos
>
>

Ah, OK. Thanks for the insights.

Cheers,
Mark