From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BF8138CD0 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 18:35:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8B1FE088C; Fri, 22 May 2015 18:35:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oc.oops.co.at (oc.oops.co.at [176.58.98.19]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EBAE0881 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 18:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oc.oops.co.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5155D8826A for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 20:35:34 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at oc.oops.co.at Received: from oc.oops.co.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (oc.oops.co.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id qjvr5qaRWkgL for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 20:35:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:15c0:65ff:8742:a11:96ff:fe52:68] (unknown [IPv6:2001:15c0:65ff:8742:a11:96ff:fe52:68]) by oc.oops.co.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA8F688269 for ; Fri, 22 May 2015 20:35:23 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xunil.at; s=mailout; t=1432319724; bh=xdihONpSMd5QBp4h2r+aDJwWWNs2b5J0t63qjGmIsKw=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=AbRd3LUtlW9ZNbaE/jvRAgZNSnkWQaPM52hX+6gn2sJ3GS4FJPGXNDONXQuS3qcd2 KAGzFlaeV3haoOJ7K+1kwEwQr6Y3w6SSPWDbMJ4xbsFKTgkQ3c+69IMWelnL1E/4zB wRka+OX1MOgKzyOv3EpQd+ueezzk7r/YSYPAQBIM= Message-ID: <555F76EB.6030104@xunil.at> Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 20:35:23 +0200 From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" Organization: oops! User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Status of Gcc-5.1.0? References: <20150520145535.a5fb85c95fb51ddfbacf9d7e@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <20150520145535.a5fb85c95fb51ddfbacf9d7e@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 13493fbe-ef93-4eff-8123-01a6f75ab14b X-Archives-Hash: 019c208f38bae8f61bae685747bba9cf Am 2015-05-20 um 20:55 schrieb Frank Peters: > What is going on with the new gcc-5.1.0? > > I've read some reports that others are already using gcc-5.1.0, > yet when I try to install gcc-5.1.0 it pulled in isl-0.14 which > completely broke my current gcc-4.9.2. As a result I could compile > nothing. I had to temporarily install the Fedora isl-0.12.2 > libraries so I could downgrade to the Gentoo version and get things > working again. > > I notice that gcc-5.1.0 has a keyword mask and isl-0.14 and > cloog-0.18.3, both of which are needed for gcc-5.1.0, are hard masked. > > My plan is to leave things alone until everything becomes unmasked > but how are others able to use gcc-5.1.0? > > The only way to do so would be to install isl-0.14 in a different > slot but I don't think portage will allow this. isl is only pulled in by USE="graphite" for gcc ... as I don't have that set I have gcc-5.1.0 compiled and working. maybe remove that flag for now?