From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-amd64+bounces-13847-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECD4138CA3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 11:53:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3DA1FE094B;
	Sun, 15 Mar 2015 11:53:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vergina.hopto.org (cust-218-222.on4.ontelecoms.gr [92.118.218.222])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733D0E08C2
	for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 11:53:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.1] (viper.vergina.hopto.org [192.168.0.1])
	by viper.vergina.hopto.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61AE060095
	for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 13:53:13 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <550572A9.7080908@asyr.hopto.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 13:53:13 +0200
From: Thanasis <thanasis@asyr.hopto.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-amd64.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: Machine recommendations?
References: <pan$7879d$2b0e267e$cb85bb8f$b318d578@cox.net>	<550348DC.8090708@asyr.hopto.org>	<pan$8e150$c0d78952$594109e2$31b648c0@cox.net>	<55042B23.6000207@asyr.hopto.org> <pan$f3f4b$d64ffc95$14d7f361$fcf6fbbc@cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <pan$f3f4b$d64ffc95$14d7f361$fcf6fbbc@cox.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: a0dea0f3-3ad4-4dbf-bc90-14ca5505c46c
X-Archives-Hash: 6d1391244ac341eef601bf25fa3f055f

On 03/15/2015 08:14 AM, Duncan wrote:
> I rather suspect the quad-port NIC will double that, but certainly that
> 250W that newegg was bundle-offering should cover it, and a 120W or so
> /might/, tho I'll definitely do more research on quad-port-NIC power-draw
> before I go much below 250.
>
I don't know which PSU you're talking about, but make sure it has good 
efficiency and is reliable.
IMHO it doesn't matter much if it's rated 120W or 450W, as long as it's 
efficient, ie 80 PLUS Gold Certified, or even better like Platinum (92+).