From: "Michael Scherer" <a6702894@unet.univie.ac.at>
To: <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Drivers For USB HDD
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 23:18:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <523B48F0E3404A6E8DCE0D6FAAD6D780@mic2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAK2H+ed+vz5r9wxJXSpV50M-1mz1pv9Jku7oQCdf6b1oRyV5Jg@mail.gmail.com
Seems this either a typo, or a contradiction:
"The USB 3.0 sockets are backward-compatible with older ... cables"
would mean I can use the old cables for 3.0, but then
"but older USB cables are not forward-compatible with USB 3.0"
says I can NOT use the old cables.
I have no 3.0, but some day I probably will, so I'd like to know what
exactly you mean.
kind regards
michael
--
Michael Scherer
Univ.klinik f. Psychiatrie
email: michael.scherer@meduniwien.ac.at
phone: +43 6991 941 22 54
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@gmail.com>
To: <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
Sent: Monday, 07 May, 2012 17:43
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Drivers For USB HDD
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Paul Hartman
> <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> here are 3 or now I
>>> think 4 different USB specs - EHCI, OHCI, UHCI, and then whatever USB
>>> 3.0 is using
>>
>> XHCI
>>
>> Furthermore, USB 3.0 has 9-pin ports and cables (for type-A) versus
>> the 4-pin of USB 1/2. The USB 3.0 sockets are backward-compatible with
>> older USB devices and cables, but older USB cables are not
>> forward-compatible with USB 3.0.
>>
>
> Good point. None of my USB 2.0 drives work in my USB 3.0 port. I do
> have a USB 3.0 drivers, supposedly, and one drive that claims to be
> eSata/USB 3.0 compatible, but I've not tried to get it working using
> USB 3.0.
>
> - Mark
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-08 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-06 18:29 [gentoo-amd64] Drivers For USB HDD Frank Peters
2012-05-06 19:18 ` Stan Sander
2012-05-06 22:12 ` Frank Peters
2012-05-06 23:46 ` Paul Hartman
2012-05-07 10:51 ` Thomas Rösner
2012-05-07 13:34 ` Frank Peters
[not found] ` <CAK2H+edzy3S9fX86frKLEvYfLN1_dg03k5B3z7DfATbF501S_A@mail.gmail.com>
2012-05-07 15:21 ` Paul Hartman
2012-05-07 15:43 ` Mark Knecht
2012-05-07 21:18 ` Michael Scherer [this message]
2012-05-07 21:42 ` Mark Knecht
2012-05-07 21:45 ` Paul Hartman
2012-05-07 21:58 ` Michael Scherer
2012-05-08 10:56 ` Thomas Rösner
2012-05-10 2:49 ` Frank Peters
2012-05-10 13:07 ` Benny Pedersen
2012-05-10 15:30 ` Sylvain Alain
2012-05-10 15:42 ` Frank Peters
2012-05-10 16:31 ` Lie Ryan
2012-05-10 16:46 ` Bob Sanders
2012-05-11 0:22 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2012-05-11 8:33 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Alex Alexander
2012-05-11 11:20 ` Rich Freeman
2012-05-07 11:31 ` David Relson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=523B48F0E3404A6E8DCE0D6FAAD6D780@mic2 \
--to=a6702894@unet.univie.ac.at \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox