From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871DA1381F3 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 20:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9F2FE0B1E; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 20:04:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-f178.google.com (mail-vc0-f178.google.com [209.85.220.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 050CAE0B0A for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 20:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f178.google.com with SMTP id m17so2261301vca.23 for ; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 13:04:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SwK5dC90Btw0TWTywkWr0dc9vOpC6tdDr3/WoS6AHhE=; b=eVXinp1eJxYWl2cyW7CKndWZF28lB8x8wWWk+X0OUCdct7F4i2xhw2mqlOW4f0DuCp kk+BMtEKfwPoCKiYjgPGLlSyurNyNfx4TZqjnjFlgQXuS5EcOAkT3K1KwcpXpfhb2ED3 3+JuNqQHJkjC39nZtf/+2aIt0e0seEtxPATKFWeDWsLL4fufy5mHsmEoiq3E4uuwHCQJ K9M5q6Skexs+iEmf4Hme/kTIDZreTx1W25WqN5LGNILhAgWkmNFeVuqJEbrh5w3Lpwfc GLeCgpoJ5FFkl4owm6g5psiI/UYBPBToPaTNWVpWF9Z1p71vy0/rJfqTBrKe860Ae/Uz VBLQ== X-Received: by 10.220.195.195 with SMTP id ed3mr813380vcb.33.1372709055224; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 13:04:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-120-51.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.120.51]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gb10sm15119750vdc.6.2013.07.01.13.04.12 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 01 Jul 2013 13:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51D1E0BB.3080009@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:04:11 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Kernel-3.10 Nvidia Emerge Failure And Other Stuff References: <20130701153542.eedab9994a52502121e7e8e5@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 908f6cf7-dc1c-4700-9d0f-2c6486dd6a13 X-Archives-Hash: 14b54b14261d4a3e3b4376c75735da39 Mark Knecht wrote: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Frank Peters wrote: > >> However, the main problem for me with kernel-3.20 is that the nvidia-drivers >> will fail to emerge. Here is the error: >> >> nvidia-drivers-319.32/work/kernel/nv-i2c.c: In function 'nv_i2c_del_adapter': >> nv-i2c.c:327:14: error: void value not ignored as it ought to be >> >> When I encountered this failure I expected that a huge outcry of bug reports >> would ensue, but so far things have been rather quiet. There are only a few >> postings of this problem with 3.10-rc1 and not much else. >> >> I should perhaps just patiently wait for the eventual rapid fix, because this >> error is a real show stopper, but I will make an inquiry nonetheless. >> Has anyone on the list encountered this error with nvidia and kernel-3.10? >> >> I hope it is not, again, some strange affliction peculiar to my machine. >> >> Frank Peters > > Hi Frank, > I don't think the Gentoo devs pay much attention to that sort of > failure. I don't report them anymore. > > My personal experience with major kernel revision jumps like this > is that it's best to give NVidia a few days and to watch their web > site for a new version. They typically update very quickly. (1-2 days) > > HTH, > Mark > > I seem to recall that nvidia only supports 3.9 right now. As Mark says, give them some time to update then try again. Hope that helps. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!