From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-amd64+bounces-13323-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7971381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:47:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EDCAE0963;
	Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:47:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ee0-f50.google.com (mail-ee0-f50.google.com [74.125.83.50])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFFEBE0955
	for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:47:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ee0-f50.google.com with SMTP id d49so6068282eek.23
        for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=U67UyFWypQAgsdjQHkmDJBHXrSm919DUTG+8fmM2yv8=;
        b=XAkImOv6w+7xXwxz3KUVonGMUMv3UPimZZxOxVAKGVArw0seX338G6YzqvfkAw04mJ
         FQWeSAqaJmjpDdLGb62JbgfRusfuVyhfC5AKWhCbpFpyfzevwbTzuoh3XZEuGzAgQnT7
         pEvXjZv5T7n3aw3SLU0fzh5htZUOZl1PwfGkBs6unq57VRehoum1I6/i6yeREys9zAhx
         +uTeJvq49vri6gb6fYLZiZI97LWjepkcMm81JsaeFYo1E3dndn8LZ5dm02x4jhiZe9h/
         /DvYsvsIt6gPvxy2XPWsly3PJ11N62qgYW20g32yd4dSjO55uTYs70SoDYNrFJdoO5A/
         QY6A==
X-Received: by 10.14.105.66 with SMTP id j42mr25666102eeg.126.1372099661147;
        Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] (p57B54634.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [87.181.70.52])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m1sm30355139eex.17.2013.06.24.11.47.38
        for <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51C8944A.30309@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 20:47:38 +0200
From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130615 Thunderbird/17.0.6
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-amd64+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-amd64.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Is my RAID performance bad possibly due to starting
 sector value?
References: <CAK2H+ecth45ADi=k=1b4y8eowYNqoABTo3iMgEzV6pAmthusVA@mail.gmail.com> <51C35503.2020608@googlemail.com> <CAK2H+efQ7GMsdt1D8147r9=zbyjVk6dWOtLuXW=a53L+ZGH5uw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAK2H+efQ7GMsdt1D8147r9=zbyjVk6dWOtLuXW=a53L+ZGH5uw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 5c7ff772-6de3-4243-84e1-25591faf5634
X-Archives-Hash: c3b9bb18b10ea442addcd18631641fe8

Am 20.06.2013 22:45, schrieb Mark Knecht:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
> <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> wrote:
> <SNIP>
>> man mkfs.xfs
>>
>> man mkfs.ext4
>>
>> look for stripe size etc.
>>
>> Have fun.
>>
> Volker,
>    I find way down at the bottom of the RAID setup page that they do
> say stride & stripe are important for RAID4 & RAID5, but remain
> non-committal for RAID6.

raid 6 is just raid5 with additional parity. So stripe size is not less
important.