* [gentoo-amd64] Thunderbird segfaults @ 2005-10-26 0:25 Richard Freeman 2005-10-26 10:40 ` Sebastian Redl ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Richard Freeman @ 2005-10-26 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-amd64 Is anybody else having segfault problems with thunderbird after the latest upgrade (1.0.7)? I'm guessing there was a GLSA of some sort as this version was very rapidly made stable and the old version was removed from portage. So, now I'm stuck without a working version. I guess I can just manually untar my old binary package, or possibly dig up the old version out of CVS (sure, security bugs are bad, but a non-working version isn't much better). Apparently there have been several segfault issues reported with this version but these tend to be related to particular messages. In my case the problem persists even after getting rid of the .thunderbird directory - so it can't be profile-related (unless I'm missing something). I was just curious if there are many others running thunderbird on stable amd64. Perhaps the problem does not occur with ~amd64. I would assume that somebody tested the package on stable amd64 before marking it stable, but that might be assuming too much since I get the impression that not too many around here bother with stable... :) In any case, I'm trying to get an idea of whether this problem is unique to me, or simply the result of trying to run non-~amd64. -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] Thunderbird segfaults 2005-10-26 0:25 [gentoo-amd64] Thunderbird segfaults Richard Freeman @ 2005-10-26 10:40 ` Sebastian Redl 2005-10-26 12:25 ` Marco Matthies 2005-10-26 14:48 ` Florian D. 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Sebastian Redl @ 2005-10-26 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-amd64 Richard Freeman wrote: >Is anybody else having segfault problems with thunderbird after the latest >upgrade (1.0.7)? I'm guessing there was a GLSA of some sort as this >version was very rapidly made stable and the old version was removed from >portage. So, now I'm stuck without a working version. I guess I can just >manually untar my old binary package, or possibly dig up the old version >out of CVS (sure, security bugs are bad, but a non-working version isn't >much better). > > I'm running 1.0.7 on a hybrid system (mostly amd64, some ~amd64 stuff (split KDE), and since recently the modular xorg, which is even package masked). Unlike the rest of my system, Thunderbird is nearly completely stable. I had one crash in two weeks. (On the other hand, I can bring X down by scrolling through the OOo font selection dropdown, so I'm talking about a REALLY unstable system.) For what it's worth, my emerge info: Portage 2.0.51.22-r3 (default-linux/amd64/2005.0, gcc-3.4.4, glibc-2.3.5-r2, 2.6.11-gentoo-r6vesa x86_64) ================================================================= System uname: 2.6.11-gentoo-r6vesa x86_64 AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ Gentoo Base System version 1.6.13 dev-lang/python: 2.3.5-r2, 2.4.2 sys-apps/sandbox: 1.2.12 sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.59-r6 sys-devel/automake: 1.4_p6, 1.5, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.8.5-r3, 1.9.6-r1 sys-devel/binutils: 2.15.92.0.2-r10 sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.20 virtual/os-headers: 2.6.11-r2 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="amd64" AUTOCLEAN="yes" CBUILD="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CFLAGS="-O3 -pipe -fmove-all-movables -fomit-frame-pointer -march=athlon64" CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/env /usr/kde/3.4/share/config /usr/kde/3.4/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib64/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config /usr/share/texmf/dvipdfm/config/ /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/ /usr/share/texmf/xdvi/ /var/qmail/control" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d" CXXFLAGS="-O3 -pipe -fmove-all-movables -fomit-frame-pointer -march=athlon64" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" FEATURES="autoconfig distlocks sandbox sfperms strict" GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://www.distfiles.local http://distfiles.gentoo.org http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo" LANG="en_US.utf8" LC_ALL="en_US.utf8" MAKEOPTS="-j2" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" PORTDIR="/usr/portage" PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage" SYNC="rsync://192.168.1.1/gentoo-portage" USE="amd64 X acl acpi alsa apache2 arts avi bash-completion berkdb bitmap-fonts cdparanoia cdr crypt cups curl dbus dri dvd dvdr dvdread emboss encode esd fam firefox flac foomatic foomaticdb fortran gd ggi gif gnome gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 guile imagemagick imap imlib ipv6 java jpeg jpeg2k junit kde kdeenablefinal libwww logitech-mouse lzw lzw-tiff mad mng motif mozilla mp3 mpeg mysql mysqli nas ncurses nls nptl offensive ogg oggvorbis openal opengl pam pdflib perl png ppds python qt quicktime readline samba sdl sndfile spell ssl svg tcltk tcpd tetex theora tiff truetype-fonts type1-fonts udev unicode usb userlocales vorbis wmf xine xinerama xml xml2 xosd xpm xprint xscreensaver xv zlib userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc" Unset: ASFLAGS, CTARGET, LDFLAGS, LINGUAS -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] Thunderbird segfaults 2005-10-26 0:25 [gentoo-amd64] Thunderbird segfaults Richard Freeman 2005-10-26 10:40 ` Sebastian Redl @ 2005-10-26 12:25 ` Marco Matthies 2005-10-27 0:14 ` Richard Freeman 2005-10-26 14:48 ` Florian D. 2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Marco Matthies @ 2005-10-26 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-amd64 Hi Richard, i have had no problems (never crashed) with thunderbird 1.07 on a mostly amd64 system, the only things from ~amd64 are a few apps where i installed newer versions. Maybe you should try thunderbird-bin? Also you might want to check your CFLAGS, thunderbird seems sensitive to this (manages to trigger many gcc bugs). Marco -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] Thunderbird segfaults 2005-10-26 12:25 ` Marco Matthies @ 2005-10-27 0:14 ` Richard Freeman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Richard Freeman @ 2005-10-27 0:14 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-amd64 [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 964 bytes --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Marco Matthies wrote: > > Maybe you should try thunderbird-bin? Also you might want to check your > CFLAGS, thunderbird seems sensitive to this (manages to trigger many gcc > bugs). > Hmm - thought I had tried that, but indeed dropping to just -O2 makes it work (apparently CFLAGS="-O2" emerge mozilla-thunderbird isn't enough to get rid of the flags in make.conf). My guess is that -fstack-protector is breaking it. The latest firefox build fails with this flag as well I believe. Figures - the two programs which could probably use it most, but the bug could easily be in gcc itself, and almost certainly is an upstream issue. Thanks for the feedback! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDYBvyg2bN8aFizRkRAkEHAJwJtHW+qYCi+XtjzJQT5BcM8D+saACdGQAq wganvwiJ2bHu5A3hKcTaWTs= =ypDA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- [-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --] [-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 4275 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] Thunderbird segfaults 2005-10-26 0:25 [gentoo-amd64] Thunderbird segfaults Richard Freeman 2005-10-26 10:40 ` Sebastian Redl 2005-10-26 12:25 ` Marco Matthies @ 2005-10-26 14:48 ` Florian D. 2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Florian D. @ 2005-10-26 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw To: gentoo-amd64 > I was just curious if there are many others running thunderbird on stable > amd64. Perhaps the problem does not occur with ~amd64. I would assume I´m running thungerbird on mostly stable amd64, just a few exceptions in package.keywords. No crash at all :-) > that somebody tested the package on stable amd64 before marking it stable, > but that might be assuming too much since I get the impression that not > too many around here bother with stable... :) I´m sure, the _silent_ majority uses stable amd64 -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-10-27 0:17 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-10-26 0:25 [gentoo-amd64] Thunderbird segfaults Richard Freeman 2005-10-26 10:40 ` Sebastian Redl 2005-10-26 12:25 ` Marco Matthies 2005-10-27 0:14 ` Richard Freeman 2005-10-26 14:48 ` Florian D.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox