public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] About to install on a 64 bit system. Advice wanted.
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:42:36 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0106FC.5020905@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201012090822.45379.stsander@sblan.net>

Stan Sander wrote:
> Wednesday 08 December 2010
>
>
>    
>> Glad you posted this.  I looked at the USE flags for grub not a package
>> called grub-static.  That seems to be two different beasts.  I never
>> knew that package existed.  Would emerging the plain grub with the
>> static USE flag give the same results?  I would think not else they
>> would just have one package but am curious just the same.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Dale
>>      
> No, the static use flag in grub does not do the same thing.  If you run a no-multilib profile (in other words pure 64-bit) you need to run grub-static if you are going to use grub as a boot loader.  As Frank said, lilo is still maintained and is a viable choice.  So that's what it comes down to, your choices -- lilo or grub, multilib or no-multilib.  Personally I've run no-multilib for some time now and have not ever wished otherwise since I made the switch.  If you run a multilib profile, you can use the regular grub package (or lilo) with whatever USE flags suit your needs.  You can also use grub-static in a multilib profile.  If you select the no-multilib profile grub will be hard masked.
>
>    

New info so a new decision.  I plan to go no-multilib so looks like I 
will be using grub-static after all.  Please disregard the post I sent a 
few seconds ago saying I would try the plain grub first.  ;-)

Still have no desire to use lilo.  lol

Dale

:-)  :-)



  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-09 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-08 21:17 [gentoo-amd64] About to install on a 64 bit system. Advice wanted Dale
2010-12-08 22:23 ` Mark Knecht
2010-12-09  0:04   ` Dale
2010-12-09  2:13     ` Stan Sander
2010-12-09  4:51       ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09  5:32         ` Dale
2010-12-09  7:42           ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 16:28             ` Dale
2010-12-09 19:55               ` Duncan
2010-12-09  5:13       ` [gentoo-amd64] " Dale
2010-12-09  8:53         ` J. Roeleveld
2010-12-09 10:04         ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 15:19           ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 16:37             ` Dale
2010-12-09 17:37               ` Harry Holt
2010-12-09 18:40                 ` Dale
2010-12-09 16:39           ` Dale
2010-12-09 15:22         ` [gentoo-amd64] " Stan Sander
2010-12-09 16:42           ` Dale [this message]
2010-12-09  8:48   ` J. Roeleveld
2010-12-09 15:48     ` Dale
2010-12-10 12:09       ` J. Roeleveld
2010-12-08 22:58 ` Mateusz Arkadiusz Mierzwinski
2010-12-09  0:08   ` Dale
2010-12-08 23:03 ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09  0:26   ` Dale
2010-12-09  1:13     ` Mateusz Arkadiusz Mierzwinski
2010-12-09  5:29       ` Dale
2010-12-09  9:48         ` Florian Philipp
2010-12-09 11:43           ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 16:47             ` Dale
2010-12-09 11:58           ` [gentoo-amd64] " Paul Jewell
2010-12-09 14:09             ` Mateusz Arkadiusz Mierzwinski
2010-12-09 15:13               ` Mark Knecht
2010-12-09 16:53                 ` Dale
2010-12-09 20:22                   ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 14:52             ` [gentoo-amd64] " J. Roeleveld
2010-12-09 16:55               ` Dale
2010-12-09 18:03                 ` Mark Knecht
2010-12-10 12:34                 ` Alex Alexander
2010-12-11  2:12                   ` Dale
2010-12-09 15:27             ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 16:26               ` Harry Holt
2010-12-09 17:04               ` Lie Ryan
2010-12-09 19:01                 ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 20:09                   ` Harry Holt
2010-12-09  1:17     ` Mark Knecht
2010-12-09  1:54     ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09  4:41       ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09  5:18       ` [gentoo-amd64] " Dale
2010-12-09  6:55         ` Thomas M
2010-12-09  7:26           ` Dale
2010-12-09  9:36         ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09  4:13     ` Duncan
2010-12-09  6:11       ` Dale
2010-12-09 11:10         ` Duncan
2010-12-09 15:36         ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 20:05           ` Duncan
2010-12-09 23:22             ` Dale
2010-12-10 12:54       ` Thanasis
2010-12-10 22:48         ` Duncan
2010-12-09  2:27 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Alex Schuster
2010-12-09  5:21   ` Dale
2010-12-09  9:33     ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 10:12       ` Florian Philipp
2010-12-09 11:18         ` Duncan
2010-12-09 17:03           ` Dale
2010-12-09 20:33             ` Duncan
2010-12-09 21:45               ` Alex Schuster
2010-12-09 23:28                 ` Dale
2010-12-10 11:59                   ` J. Roeleveld
2010-12-10 13:16                     ` Dale
2010-12-09 10:06   ` [gentoo-amd64] " Stefan G. Weichinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D0106FC.5020905@gmail.com \
    --to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox