From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: About to install on a 64 bit system. Advice wanted.
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 10:28:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D0103B7.70505@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2010.12.09.07.42.31@cox.net>
Duncan wrote:
> Dale posted on Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:32:29 -0600 as excerpted:
>
>
>> I used lilo when I first started using Linux, Mandrake 9.1 days. When I
>> started with Gentoo, I switched to grub. I can't even imagine being
>> without grub. I know lilo has some strong points and is maintained but
>> I still prefer grub. I also read that a new grub is in the pipe too.
>> Supposed to be much better. That's the rumor anyway.
>>
> Grub is nice on local machines, due to the ability to use its interactive
> shell. That can be quite useful when the config is screwed up for some
> reason. On remote machines where the interactivity until booted is much
> lower anyway, that doesn't matter so much (if at all) and lilo is as good,
> possibly better.
>
> As for grub2... yes, it's in the pipe... as it has been for /years/.
> Unfortunately, they did the same thing kde did and pulled support for
> their current stable version LONG before the new version was stable,
> leaving users between a rock and a hard place. Fortunately, grub is far
> smaller and less complex than all of kde, and distributions were able to
> step in and pick up the slack (yeah, free software, try doing that with
> servantware when the original company abandons it), continuing to both
> keep it building with new toolchains, and add new features like support
> for ext4, etc.
>
> Unfortunately, last I knew, grub2 wasn't even officially on-disk-format-
> stable yet, tho with ubuntu and etc already using it, it's getting more
> difficult to change it, and they were /probably/ done with changes, but at
> least last I knew, it wasn't official, yet.
>
> FWIW, there's a (masked) grub-2 in the tree, that I've been thinking about
> playing with at some point, but I've not gotten to it. When I eventually
> do, I'll know quite a bit more about it, but grub1 (0.97-rX) has continued
> to work fine for me, so no rush.
>
>
One would think people would learn from KDE that stopping support for
one to favor the new one makes people . . . upset. I guess some people
never learn tho.
Dale
:-) :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-09 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-08 21:17 [gentoo-amd64] About to install on a 64 bit system. Advice wanted Dale
2010-12-08 22:23 ` Mark Knecht
2010-12-09 0:04 ` Dale
2010-12-09 2:13 ` Stan Sander
2010-12-09 4:51 ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 5:32 ` Dale
2010-12-09 7:42 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 16:28 ` Dale [this message]
2010-12-09 19:55 ` Duncan
2010-12-09 5:13 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Dale
2010-12-09 8:53 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-12-09 10:04 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 15:19 ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 16:37 ` Dale
2010-12-09 17:37 ` Harry Holt
2010-12-09 18:40 ` Dale
2010-12-09 16:39 ` Dale
2010-12-09 15:22 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Stan Sander
2010-12-09 16:42 ` Dale
2010-12-09 8:48 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-12-09 15:48 ` Dale
2010-12-10 12:09 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-12-08 22:58 ` Mateusz Arkadiusz Mierzwinski
2010-12-09 0:08 ` Dale
2010-12-08 23:03 ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 0:26 ` Dale
2010-12-09 1:13 ` Mateusz Arkadiusz Mierzwinski
2010-12-09 5:29 ` Dale
2010-12-09 9:48 ` Florian Philipp
2010-12-09 11:43 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 16:47 ` Dale
2010-12-09 11:58 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Paul Jewell
2010-12-09 14:09 ` Mateusz Arkadiusz Mierzwinski
2010-12-09 15:13 ` Mark Knecht
2010-12-09 16:53 ` Dale
2010-12-09 20:22 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 14:52 ` [gentoo-amd64] " J. Roeleveld
2010-12-09 16:55 ` Dale
2010-12-09 18:03 ` Mark Knecht
2010-12-10 12:34 ` Alex Alexander
2010-12-11 2:12 ` Dale
2010-12-09 15:27 ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 16:26 ` Harry Holt
2010-12-09 17:04 ` Lie Ryan
2010-12-09 19:01 ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 20:09 ` Harry Holt
2010-12-09 1:17 ` Mark Knecht
2010-12-09 1:54 ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 4:41 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 5:18 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Dale
2010-12-09 6:55 ` Thomas M
2010-12-09 7:26 ` Dale
2010-12-09 9:36 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 4:13 ` Duncan
2010-12-09 6:11 ` Dale
2010-12-09 11:10 ` Duncan
2010-12-09 15:36 ` Frank Peters
2010-12-09 20:05 ` Duncan
2010-12-09 23:22 ` Dale
2010-12-10 12:54 ` Thanasis
2010-12-10 22:48 ` Duncan
2010-12-09 2:27 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Alex Schuster
2010-12-09 5:21 ` Dale
2010-12-09 9:33 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2010-12-09 10:12 ` Florian Philipp
2010-12-09 11:18 ` Duncan
2010-12-09 17:03 ` Dale
2010-12-09 20:33 ` Duncan
2010-12-09 21:45 ` Alex Schuster
2010-12-09 23:28 ` Dale
2010-12-10 11:59 ` J. Roeleveld
2010-12-10 13:16 ` Dale
2010-12-09 10:06 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Stefan G. Weichinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D0103B7.70505@gmail.com \
--to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox