* [gentoo-amd64] libXprintAppUtil
@ 2009-09-15 11:59 Mark Haney
2009-09-15 12:22 ` Jan Jitse
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Haney @ 2009-09-15 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
I have a question. I've found that there is no ebuild for
libXprintAppUtil that I can find. I had to unmerge it to finish up the
libxcb upgrade from yesterday, but now I have it showing up in my
upgrade listing:
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "x11-libs/libXprintAppUtil".
> (dependency required by "virtual/x11-7.0-r2" [installed])
> (dependency required by "world" [argument])
What do I do with this? Can I unmerge virtual/X11?
--
Non curo. Si metrum non habet, non est poema.
Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] libXprintAppUtil
2009-09-15 11:59 [gentoo-amd64] libXprintAppUtil Mark Haney
@ 2009-09-15 12:22 ` Jan Jitse
2009-09-15 12:23 ` Mark Haney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Jitse @ 2009-09-15 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
On Tuesday 15 September 2009 13:59:37 Mark Haney wrote:
> I have a question. I've found that there is no ebuild for
> libXprintAppUtil that I can find. I had to unmerge it to finish up the
> libxcb upgrade from yesterday, but now I have it showing up in my
>
> upgrade listing:
> > emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "x11-libs/libXprintAppUtil".
> > (dependency required by "virtual/x11-7.0-r2" [installed])
> > (dependency required by "world" [argument])
>
> What do I do with this? Can I unmerge virtual/X11?
>
Yes. virtual/X11 has been gone from the tree for 2 years now[1]. It shouldn't
be necessary to have it on the system anymore, and, as you found out, will
probably break stuff.
Jan Jitse
[1]http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/virtual/x11/?hideattic=0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] libXprintAppUtil
2009-09-15 12:22 ` Jan Jitse
@ 2009-09-15 12:23 ` Mark Haney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mark Haney @ 2009-09-15 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
Jan Jitse wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 September 2009 13:59:37 Mark Haney wrote:
> Yes. virtual/X11 has been gone from the tree for 2 years now[1]. It shouldn't
> be necessary to have it on the system anymore, and, as you found out, will
> probably break stuff.
>
> Jan Jitse
>
> [1]http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/virtual/x11/?hideattic=0
>
Holy crap! 2 years? Bloody hell I need to pay better attention.
--
Non curo. Si metrum non habet, non est poema.
Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-15 12:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-15 11:59 [gentoo-amd64] libXprintAppUtil Mark Haney
2009-09-15 12:22 ` Jan Jitse
2009-09-15 12:23 ` Mark Haney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox