[gentoo-amd64] FF 3.5

[gentoo-amd64] FF 3.5

[Mark Haney]

When will FF 3.5 be in portage?  I've seen the ebuild, but haven't found
it on the mirrors yet. I don't care if it's masked, I want to try it and
help debug if necessary.

-- 
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

Re: [gentoo-amd64] FF 3.5

[Fernando Boaglio]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 43 bytes --]

It's already there!

[]'s
Fernando Boaglio

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 68 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-amd64] FF 3.5

[Josh Sled]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 569 bytes --]

"Mark Haney" <mhaney@ercbroadband.org> writes:
> When will FF 3.5 be in portage?  I've seen the ebuild, but haven't found
> it on the mirrors yet. I don't care if it's masked, I want to try it and
> help debug if necessary.

Then install ff3.5_rc3 (and it's masked/keyworded deps) from the mozilla
overlay <http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/mozilla> to help test.

I had some issues with xulrunner-1.9.1_rc2, but _rc3 fixes them, and I
built 3.5_rc3 earlier w/o problems.

-- 
...jsled
http://asynchronous.org/ - a=jsled; b=asynchronous.org; echo ${a}@${b}

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-amd64] FF 3.5

[Mark Haney]

Fernando Boaglio wrote:
> It's already there!
> 
> []'s
> Fernando Boaglio
> 

Okay, I've sync'd portage twice the last two days and don't see it.  Is
it hard masked for ~amd64?  Or am I just hitting screwy mirrors?


-- 
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

Re: [gentoo-amd64] FF 3.5

[Nikolai Drozd]

It is masked by package.mask and ~amd64

Mark Haney пишет:
> Fernando Boaglio wrote:
>> It's already there!
>>
>> []'s
>> Fernando Boaglio
>>
> 
> Okay, I've sync'd portage twice the last two days and don't see it.  Is
> it hard masked for ~amd64?  Or am I just hitting screwy mirrors?
> 
> 

Re: [gentoo-amd64] FF 3.5

[Sebastian Beßler]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 675 bytes --]

Mark Haney schrieb:
> Fernando Boaglio wrote:
>> It's already there!
>> 
>> []'s Fernando Boaglio
>> 
> 
> Okay, I've sync'd portage twice the last two days and don't see it.
> Is it hard masked for ~amd64?  Or am I just hitting screwy mirrors?

It's hard masked.

package.mask in profile-dir says:

# Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org> (24 Jun 2009)
# Firefox Release Candidates
# nspr-4.8 has soname bump
=www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5*
=net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.1*
=dev-libs/nspr-4.8*

On my ~amd64-setup here all runs and compiles fine, but naturaly I can
only speek for a limited number of ebuilds and progs.

Greetings

Sebastian Beßler


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 261 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-amd64] FF 3.5

[Martin Polak]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 426 bytes --]

> It's hard masked.
> 
> package.mask in profile-dir says:
> 
> # Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org> (24 Jun 2009)
> # Firefox Release Candidates
> # nspr-4.8 has soname bump
> =www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5*
> =net-libs/xulrunner-1.9.1*
> =dev-libs/nspr-4.8*
> 

I've commented the lines on my system and successfully built it.
However I had to revdep-rebuild afterwards as suggested ....
(some nss dependency)

Martin


[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3505 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-amd64] FF 3.5

[Sebastian Beßler]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 402 bytes --]

Martin Polak schrieb:

> I've commented the lines on my system and successfully built it.
> However I had to revdep-rebuild afterwards as suggested ....
> (some nss dependency)

I hope by "I've commented the lines" you mean that you unmasked it via
/etc/portace/package.unmask
If not the next sync overrides your comments and firefox 3.5 gets masked
again.

Greetings

Sebastian Beßler


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 261 bytes --]

[gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

[Duncan]

"Mark Haney" <mhaney@ercbroadband.org> posted
4A4B4A11.8040205@ercbroadband.org, excerpted below, on  Wed, 01 Jul 2009
07:35:45 -0400:

> Fernando Boaglio wrote:
>> It's already there!
>> 
>> []'s
>> Fernando Boaglio
>> 
>> 
> Okay, I've sync'd portage twice the last two days and don't see it.  Is
> it hard masked for ~amd64?  Or am I just hitting screwy mirrors?

I don't see it either, as "www-client/mozilla-firefox":

######################################################################
equery l -p mozilla-firefox
 * Searching for mozilla-firefox ...
[-P-] [  ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.19 (0)
[-P-] [  ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.0.10 (0)
[IP-] [ ~] www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.0.11 (0)

######################################################################
epkginfo mozilla-firefox
Package: www-client/mozilla-firefox
Herd: mozilla
Maintainer: none
Location: /p/www-client/mozilla-firefox
Keywords: mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.19[0]: ~mips ~x86-fbsd
Keywords: mozilla-firefox-3.0.10[0]:
Keywords: mozilla-firefox-3.0.11[0]: alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 
sparc x86

######################################################################

BUT esearching for firefox:

esearch -Sc firefox
[ I] www-client/mozilla-firefox (3.0.11):  Firefox Web Browser
[MN] www-client/mozilla-firefox-bin (3.5):  Firefox Web Browser
[ N] www-client/mozilla-launcher (1.59):  Script that launches mozilla or 
firefox
[MN] www-plugins/mozilla-weave (0.3.2):  Mozilla Labs prototype for 
online services into Firefox
[ N] x11-plugins/noscript (1.9.0.4):  Firefox plugin to disable javascript

So the 32-bit prebuilt binary-only x86 version is there as
www-client/mozilla-firefox-bin, but the from-source version apparently  
hasn't hit the tree yet (as of when I last synced a few hours ago), 
masked or unmasked.

I'm guessing there's some problems with the build they're trying to fix.  
Let's see what gentoo bugzilla has to say...

Hmm... seems it's in the mozilla overlay, but not yet in the tree, here's 
the buglist URL (watch the wrap):

http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ALL+www-client%2Fmozilla-
firefox-3.5

Not too many bugs listed, yet.  Whatever's keeping it out of the tree 
probably isn't bugged, as they already know about it and are working on 
it in the overlay.

It'd be nice if they'd put it in the tree, hard-masked if necessary.  
That's the frustration with overlays.  They're fine with betas and rcs 
and whatever, but once upstream releases, moving it to the tree proper, 
even if hard masked, would be nice.  But some devs/projects prefer to 
continue with the overlay until all the problems are worked out, which is 
frustrating for those who want to test it, and are willing to do so even 
if they have to unmask it, regardless of whatever's keeping it hard 
masked.

Anyway, it's apparently in the mozilla overlay.  Either merge layman if 
necessary and use it to manage your overlays, adding the mozilla overlay 
there, or handle the overlay (which requires subversion) manually, or 
wait... I guess.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

[Marc Joliet]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2855 bytes --]

Am Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:11:05 +0000 (UTC)
schrieb Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>:

> "Mark Haney" <mhaney@ercbroadband.org> posted
> 4A4B4A11.8040205@ercbroadband.org, excerpted below, on  Wed, 01 Jul 2009
> 07:35:45 -0400:
> 
> > Fernando Boaglio wrote:
> >> It's already there!
> >> 
> >> []'s
> >> Fernando Boaglio
> >> 
> >> 
> > Okay, I've sync'd portage twice the last two days and don't see it.  Is
> > it hard masked for ~amd64?  Or am I just hitting screwy mirrors?
> 
> I don't see it either, as "www-client/mozilla-firefox":
> 
> ######################################################################
> equery l -p mozilla-firefox
>  * Searching for mozilla-firefox ...
> [-P-] [  ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.19 (0)
> [-P-] [  ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.0.10 (0)
> [IP-] [ ~] www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.0.11 (0)
> 
> ######################################################################
> epkginfo mozilla-firefox
> Package: www-client/mozilla-firefox
> Herd: mozilla
> Maintainer: none
> Location: /p/www-client/mozilla-firefox
> Keywords: mozilla-firefox-2.0.0.19[0]: ~mips ~x86-fbsd
> Keywords: mozilla-firefox-3.0.10[0]:
> Keywords: mozilla-firefox-3.0.11[0]: alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ppc ppc64 
> sparc x86
> 
> ######################################################################
> 
> BUT esearching for firefox:
> 
> esearch -Sc firefox
> [ I] www-client/mozilla-firefox (3.0.11):  Firefox Web Browser
> [MN] www-client/mozilla-firefox-bin (3.5):  Firefox Web Browser
> [ N] www-client/mozilla-launcher (1.59):  Script that launches mozilla or 
> firefox
> [MN] www-plugins/mozilla-weave (0.3.2):  Mozilla Labs prototype for 
> online services into Firefox
> [ N] x11-plugins/noscript (1.9.0.4):  Firefox plugin to disable javascript
> 
[...]

Well, I just installed FF 3.5 last night, so I wonder why it is that you're
having problems "seeing" it.

marcec@marcec ~ % emerge -s mozilla-firefox
Searching...   
[ Results for search key : mozilla-firefox ]
[ Applications found : 2 ]
 
*  www-client/mozilla-firefox
      Latest version available: 3.5
      Latest version installed: 3.5
      Size of files: 54,936 kB
      Homepage:      http://www.mozilla.com/firefox
      Description:   Firefox Web Browser
      License:       || ( MPL-1.1 GPL-2 LGPL-2.1 )
[...]

Not to mention according to [0] and [1], FF 3.5 is still in the tree. I'm going
to assume that not all mirrors have synced yet, so maybe that's the problem.

[0] http://packages.gentoo.org/package/www-client/mozilla-firefox
[1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=275973 (comment #6)

-- 
Marc Joliet
--
Lt. Frank Drebin: "It's true what they say: cops and women don't mix. Like
eating a spoonful of Drāno; sure, it'll clean you out, but it'll leave you
hollow inside."

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

[Duncan]

Marc Joliet <marcec@gmx.de> posted
20090701150926.5b14acaf@marcec.huntemann.uni-oldenburg.de, excerpted
below, on  Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:09:26 +0200:

> Well, I just installed FF 3.5 last night, so I wonder why it is that
> you're having problems "seeing" it.

> Not to mention according to [0] and [1], FF 3.5 is still in the tree.
> I'm going to assume that not all mirrors have synced yet, so maybe
> that's the problem.

Must be...

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

[Mark Haney]

Duncan wrote:
> Marc Joliet <marcec@gmx.de> posted
> 20090701150926.5b14acaf@marcec.huntemann.uni-oldenburg.de, excerpted
> below, on  Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:09:26 +0200:
> 
>> Well, I just installed FF 3.5 last night, so I wonder why it is that
>> you're having problems "seeing" it.

> 
> Must be...
> 

Well I've resync'd portage once this morning and once this afternoon.
No FF.  That's really rather annoying.


-- 
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

[Bob Sanders]

Mark Haney, mused, then expounded:
> 
> Well I've resync'd portage once this morning and once this afternoon.
> No FF.  That's really rather annoying.
> 
>

It's there - 

$ cat /usr/portage/www-client/mozilla-firefox/mozilla-firefox-3.5.ebuild
|grep KEY
KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~hppa ~ia64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86"


But it's masked as it's untested.

Bob

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

[Mark Haney]

Bob Sanders wrote:

> It's there - 
> 
> $ cat /usr/portage/www-client/mozilla-firefox/mozilla-firefox-3.5.ebuild
> |grep KEY
> KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~hppa ~ia64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86"
> 
> 
> But it's masked as it's untested.
> 
> Bob
> 
Uh, no it's not.

octavian ~ # ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64" emerge -s mozilla-firefox

Searching...
[ Results for search key : mozilla-firefox ]
[ Applications found : 2 ]

*  www-client/mozilla-firefox
      Latest version available: 3.0.11
      Latest version installed: 3.0.11
      Size of files: 52,557 kB
      Homepage:      http://www.mozilla.com/firefox
      Description:   Firefox Web Browser
      License:       || ( MPL-1.1 GPL-2 LGPL-2.1 )

*  www-client/mozilla-firefox-bin
      Latest version available: 3.0.11
      Latest version installed: 3.0.11
      Size of files: 16,497 kB
      Homepage:      http://www.mozilla.com/firefox
      Description:   Firefox Web Browser
      License:       || ( MPL-1.1 GPL-2 LGPL-2.1 )


-- 
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

[Bob Sanders]

Mark Haney, mused, then expounded:
> Bob Sanders wrote:
> 
> > It's there - 
> > 
> > $ cat /usr/portage/www-client/mozilla-firefox/mozilla-firefox-3.5.ebuild
> > |grep KEY
> > KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~hppa ~ia64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sparc ~x86"
> > 
> > 
> > But it's masked as it's untested.
> > 
> > Bob
> > 
> Uh, no it's not.
> 

Sorry, it's masked -

!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "=www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5"
have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
request:
- www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5 (masked by: package.mask)
/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org> (24 Jun 2009)
# Firefox Release Candidates
# nspr-4.8 has soname bump


-  

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

[Mark Haney]

Bob Sanders wrote:
> Mark Haney, mused, then expounded:

> 
> Sorry, it's masked -
> 
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "=www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5"
> have been masked.
> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
> request:
> - www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5 (masked by: package.mask)
> /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
> # Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org> (24 Jun 2009)
> # Firefox Release Candidates
> # nspr-4.8 has soname bump
> 
> 
> -  
> 
Okay, based on what I read, the ebuild was masked ~amd64, right?  If so,
the Accepting the ~amd64 keyword should allow me to install it, right?
If that's the case, then my portage doesn't have it.




-- 
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

[Paul Hartman]

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Mark Haney<mhaney@ercbroadband.org> wrote:
> Okay, based on what I read, the ebuild was masked ~amd64, right?  If so,
> the Accepting the ~amd64 keyword should allow me to install it, right?
> If that's the case, then my portage doesn't have it.

You need to unmask it in your package.unmask/package.keywords
files/directories Emerge the "autounmask" util to make this task dead
simple. :)

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

[Bob Sanders]

Mark Haney, mused, then expounded:
> Bob Sanders wrote:
> > Mark Haney, mused, then expounded:
> 
> > 
> > Sorry, it's masked -
> > 
> > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "=www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5"
> > have been masked.
> > !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
> > request:
> > - www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5 (masked by: package.mask)
> > /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
> > # Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org> (24 Jun 2009)
> > # Firefox Release Candidates
> > # nspr-4.8 has soname bump
> > 
> > 
> > -  
> > 
> Okay, based on what I read, the ebuild was masked ~amd64, right?  If so,
> the Accepting the ~amd64 keyword should allow me to install it, right?
> If that's the case, then my portage doesn't have it.
> 
>

No, it's not just arch masked.  It's masked in package.mask.  So
simply using a keyword unmask won't work.

And you're portage does have it.  Give this a try - 

ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64" emerge -av =mozilla-firefox-3.5


But it's not going to let you install it without you doing
some work to unmask the package.

bob
-- 
-  

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

[Sebastian Beßler]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 954 bytes --]

Mark Haney schrieb:
> Bob Sanders wrote:
>> Mark Haney, mused, then expounded:
> 
>> Sorry, it's masked -
>> 
>> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy
>> "=www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5" have been masked. !!! One of the
>> following masked packages is required to complete your request: -
>> www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5 (masked by: package.mask)

> Okay, based on what I read, the ebuild was masked ~amd64, right?  If
> so, the Accepting the ~amd64 keyword should allow me to install it,
> right? If that's the case, then my portage doesn't have it.

NO!! It is hardmasked in package.mask
Look at the (masked by: package.mask)

To unmask it, use

echo "~www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5">>/etc/portage/package.unmask

Maybe other packages must be unmasked to.
You know if emerge =www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.5 says so.
Add the other packages to package.unmask same way as with firefox above.

Greetings

Sebastian Beßler



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 261 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

[Mark Haney]

Bob Sanders wrote:

>>
> 
> No, it's not just arch masked.  It's masked in package.mask.  So
> simply using a keyword unmask won't work.
> 
> And you're portage does have it.  Give this a try - 
> 
> ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~amd64" emerge -av =mozilla-firefox-3.5
> 
> 
> But it's not going to let you install it without you doing
> some work to unmask the package.
> 
> bob

I stand corrected.  My apologies. My brain just isn't working, I'm due
for surgery to remove a large bone fragment from my foot, so all the
vicodin I'm taking must be shorting it out.


-- 
Interdum feror cupidine partium magnarum Europae vincendarum

Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

[gentoo-amd64] Re: FF 3.5

[Duncan]

"Mark Haney" <mhaney@ercbroadband.org> posted
4A4BB3D9.8070606@ercbroadband.org, excerpted below, on  Wed, 01 Jul 2009
15:07:05 -0400:

> I stand corrected.  My apologies. My brain just isn't working, I'm due
> for surgery to remove a large bone fragment from my foot, so all the
> vicodin I'm taking must be shorting it out.

LOL.  I read the brain isn't working part, then started with the surgery 
to remove a large bone fragment... and you can guess how /my/ brain 
filled in the rest... "from my foot" is NOT what I expected!

So now thanks to you I've an image of someone walking around with a brain 
(with a large bone fragement in it) on/in their foot!

OTOH, I should be asleep right now.  I'm tired enough such imagery comes
/way/ too easily!

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman