From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L7bYg-0002QJ-Pi for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:09:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86866E04D3; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from md2.t-2.net (md2.t-2.net [84.255.209.81]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344B7E04D3 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:09:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (84-255-203-94.static.t-2.net [84.255.203.94]) by md2.t-2.net (MOS 3.10.2-GA) with ESMTP id CWM23359; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:09:19 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4935A25B.3010100@avtomatika.com> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:02:19 +0100 From: Branko Badrljica User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081123) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Completely remove BIND References: <493580B1.60704@ercbroadband.org> <200812022012.23066.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de> <49358F25.7090908@ercbroadband.org> In-Reply-To: <49358F25.7090908@ercbroadband.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/150, host=md2.t-2.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A010205.493595F0.0037,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=192.168.0.11, so=2008-08-01 02:07:42, dmn=5.7.1/2008-09-02, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false X-Archives-Salt: c7fa7770-6f74-4b98-9cd2-0373fefd1920 X-Archives-Hash: a62ddcf33c79cd7d989bd5ce6e264702 Mark Haney wrote: > Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> On Dienstag 02 Dezember 2008, Mark Haney wrote: >>> I've done something really stupid and FUBAR'd my BIND install on what >>> will be my new slave DNS server. The problem is that no matter what I >>> do, when I try to start BIND the system claims 'named is already >>> started'. >>> >>> What I want to do now is start over, tabula rasa, and rebuild BIND. >>> I've >>> tried emerge -C bind bind-tools but when I emerge it back, I still get >>> the same problem. >>> >>> So, any decent, non-system-destructive ways to wipe BIND off the >>> system. >> >> that is probably just a remnant of the init script. try >> /etc/init.d/named zap if that file still exists >> >> > > Nah, I've got bigger problems on this box. Somehow, GCC has been > completely hosed. I'll need to rebuild gcc from a liveCD. I have a > feeling the HDD on this box is failing. > > What system do you have ( x86, x86_64, normal or hardened kernel, selinux or not, which profile etc) ? If it's similar to any of mine, I could leave you binpkg of mine gcc on http server for download...