* [gentoo-amd64] Completely remove BIND
@ 2008-12-02 18:38 Mark Haney
2008-12-02 18:42 ` Bob Sanders
2008-12-02 19:12 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Haney @ 2008-12-02 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
I've done something really stupid and FUBAR'd my BIND install on what
will be my new slave DNS server. The problem is that no matter what I
do, when I try to start BIND the system claims 'named is already started'.
What I want to do now is start over, tabula rasa, and rebuild BIND. I've
tried emerge -C bind bind-tools but when I emerge it back, I still get
the same problem.
So, any decent, non-system-destructive ways to wipe BIND off the system.
--
Frustra laborant quotquot se calculationibus fatigant pro inventione
quadraturae circuli
Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415
Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] Completely remove BIND
2008-12-02 18:38 [gentoo-amd64] Completely remove BIND Mark Haney
@ 2008-12-02 18:42 ` Bob Sanders
2008-12-02 18:49 ` Mark Haney
2008-12-02 19:12 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bob Sanders @ 2008-12-02 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
Mark Haney, mused, then expounded:
> I've done something really stupid and FUBAR'd my BIND install on what will
> be my new slave DNS server. The problem is that no matter what I do, when
> I try to start BIND the system claims 'named is already started'.
>
Sorry for asking the obvious..
Have you tried - /etc/init.d/{bind} zap
If you haven't rebooted the system to running flag is still set in /var.
Bob
> What I want to do now is start over, tabula rasa, and rebuild BIND. I've
> tried emerge -C bind bind-tools but when I emerge it back, I still get the
> same problem.
>
> So, any decent, non-system-destructive ways to wipe BIND off the system.
>
-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] Completely remove BIND
2008-12-02 18:42 ` Bob Sanders
@ 2008-12-02 18:49 ` Mark Haney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Haney @ 2008-12-02 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
Bob Sanders wrote:
> Mark Haney, mused, then expounded:
>> I've done something really stupid and FUBAR'd my BIND install on what will
>> be my new slave DNS server. The problem is that no matter what I do, when
>> I try to start BIND the system claims 'named is already started'.
>>
>
> Sorry for asking the obvious..
>
> Have you tried - /etc/init.d/{bind} zap
>
Yeah, probably should have mentioned, I've tried that too. Sorry, I've
tried so many things, I can't remember them all.
--
Frustra laborant quotquot se calculationibus fatigant pro inventione
quadraturae circuli
Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415
Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] Completely remove BIND
2008-12-02 18:38 [gentoo-amd64] Completely remove BIND Mark Haney
2008-12-02 18:42 ` Bob Sanders
@ 2008-12-02 19:12 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2008-12-02 19:40 ` Mark Haney
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Volker Armin Hemmann @ 2008-12-02 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
On Dienstag 02 Dezember 2008, Mark Haney wrote:
> I've done something really stupid and FUBAR'd my BIND install on what
> will be my new slave DNS server. The problem is that no matter what I
> do, when I try to start BIND the system claims 'named is already started'.
>
> What I want to do now is start over, tabula rasa, and rebuild BIND. I've
> tried emerge -C bind bind-tools but when I emerge it back, I still get
> the same problem.
>
> So, any decent, non-system-destructive ways to wipe BIND off the system.
that is probably just a remnant of the init script. try /etc/init.d/named zap
if that file still exists
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] Completely remove BIND
2008-12-02 19:12 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
@ 2008-12-02 19:40 ` Mark Haney
2008-12-02 21:02 ` Branko Badrljica
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Haney @ 2008-12-02 19:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> On Dienstag 02 Dezember 2008, Mark Haney wrote:
>> I've done something really stupid and FUBAR'd my BIND install on what
>> will be my new slave DNS server. The problem is that no matter what I
>> do, when I try to start BIND the system claims 'named is already started'.
>>
>> What I want to do now is start over, tabula rasa, and rebuild BIND. I've
>> tried emerge -C bind bind-tools but when I emerge it back, I still get
>> the same problem.
>>
>> So, any decent, non-system-destructive ways to wipe BIND off the system.
>
> that is probably just a remnant of the init script. try /etc/init.d/named zap
> if that file still exists
>
>
Nah, I've got bigger problems on this box. Somehow, GCC has been
completely hosed. I'll need to rebuild gcc from a liveCD. I have a
feeling the HDD on this box is failing.
--
Frustra laborant quotquot se calculationibus fatigant pro inventione
quadraturae circuli
Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415
Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] Completely remove BIND
2008-12-02 21:02 ` Branko Badrljica
@ 2008-12-02 20:17 ` Mark Haney
2008-12-02 22:28 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Mark Haney @ 2008-12-02 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
Branko Badrljica wrote:
>>
>> Nah, I've got bigger problems on this box. Somehow, GCC has been
>> completely hosed. I'll need to rebuild gcc from a liveCD. I have a
>> feeling the HDD on this box is failing.
>>
>>
> What system do you have ( x86, x86_64, normal or hardened kernel,
> selinux or not, which profile etc) ?
>
> If it's similar to any of mine, I could leave you binpkg of mine gcc on
> http server for download...
>
I certainly do appreciate the offer, but afer more digging, I'm pretty
well convinced the HDD is going bad quickly. Fortunately, it's not a
critical server (for now) and I'm glad this happened BEFORE we went live
with the DNS slave server.
--
Frustra laborant quotquot se calculationibus fatigant pro inventione
quadraturae circuli
Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415
Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-amd64] Completely remove BIND
2008-12-02 19:40 ` Mark Haney
@ 2008-12-02 21:02 ` Branko Badrljica
2008-12-02 20:17 ` Mark Haney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Branko Badrljica @ 2008-12-02 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
Mark Haney wrote:
> Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>> On Dienstag 02 Dezember 2008, Mark Haney wrote:
>>> I've done something really stupid and FUBAR'd my BIND install on what
>>> will be my new slave DNS server. The problem is that no matter what I
>>> do, when I try to start BIND the system claims 'named is already
>>> started'.
>>>
>>> What I want to do now is start over, tabula rasa, and rebuild BIND.
>>> I've
>>> tried emerge -C bind bind-tools but when I emerge it back, I still get
>>> the same problem.
>>>
>>> So, any decent, non-system-destructive ways to wipe BIND off the
>>> system.
>>
>> that is probably just a remnant of the init script. try
>> /etc/init.d/named zap if that file still exists
>>
>>
>
> Nah, I've got bigger problems on this box. Somehow, GCC has been
> completely hosed. I'll need to rebuild gcc from a liveCD. I have a
> feeling the HDD on this box is failing.
>
>
What system do you have ( x86, x86_64, normal or hardened kernel,
selinux or not, which profile etc) ?
If it's similar to any of mine, I could leave you binpkg of mine gcc on
http server for download...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-amd64] Re: Completely remove BIND
2008-12-02 20:17 ` Mark Haney
@ 2008-12-02 22:28 ` Duncan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Duncan @ 2008-12-02 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-amd64
"Mark Haney" <mhaney@ercbroadband.org> posted
493597DE.7080201@ercbroadband.org, excerpted below, on Tue, 02 Dec 2008
15:17:34 -0500:
> I certainly do appreciate the offer, but afer more digging, I'm pretty
> well convinced the HDD is going bad quickly. Fortunately, it's not a
> critical server (for now) and I'm glad this happened BEFORE we went live
> with the DNS slave server.
Ouch!
For production use, I'd definitely consider at least a 2-disk RAID-1 or
perhaps a 4-disk RAID-6 if you want two-way check-sums, for that very
reason. With disks what they are now ($30 US shipped, SATA 40GB,
pricewatch.com, less if you'll take pulls tho I wouldn't), even if a new
server can be imaged and brought on line quickly, it's just not worth the
hassle, for the cost of switching out a single disk and continuing in
place. Get the mdadm disk failure and walk over and hot-swap, then
monitor it while doing other things until the RAID rebuild is complete.
Pretty hard to beat.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-02 22:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-12-02 18:38 [gentoo-amd64] Completely remove BIND Mark Haney
2008-12-02 18:42 ` Bob Sanders
2008-12-02 18:49 ` Mark Haney
2008-12-02 19:12 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2008-12-02 19:40 ` Mark Haney
2008-12-02 21:02 ` Branko Badrljica
2008-12-02 20:17 ` Mark Haney
2008-12-02 22:28 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox