public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Geiger <sbastig@gmx.net>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64]  Re: Blocking package
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:26:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48FFD2AE.9060403@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2008.10.21.09.56.07@cox.net>

Hi, thanks for you advice. I follow them and was able to fix the
problem, its seemed that i had to add to unmask PyQt4 to allow
installing 4.4.2

Best Regards Sebastian Geiger

Duncan wrote:
> Sebastian Geiger <sbastig@gmx.net> posted 48FD9E6A.6060809@gmx.net,
> excerpted below, on  Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:18:34 +0200:
> 
>> i am getting a blocks package xy error, as you can see from my pastebin:
>>
>> http://rafb.net/p/tPjaUP71.html and
>>
>> http://rafb.net/p/G6e9ML21.html
>>
>> Any ideas what i should do? Im not sure if i should remove qt-4.4.2
>> since kde4 depends on it, doesnt it?
> 
> Well, yes and no.  As KDE itself, qt-4 (or at least 4.4.2+, I'm not sure 
> about earlier qt4 versions) is now split packages.  kde-4.1.2+ depends on 
> the various specific split packages, not on the qt-4+ meta-packages 
> themselves.  Thus, removing qt-4.4.2 /should/ be fine, as long as you are 
> just removing the meta-package, not the components thereof.
> 
> FWIW, I have much of kde-4.1.2 (as well as 3.5.10) merged here, and 
> here's what equery spits out for qt:
> 
> ~$equery l qt
> [ Searching for package 'qt' in all categories among: ]
>  * installed packages
> [I--] [  ] dev-libs/dbus-qt3-old-0.70 (0)
> [I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-3.3.8b (3)
> [I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-core-4.4.2 (4)
> [I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.4.2 (4)
> [I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-gui-4.4.2 (4)
> [I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.4.2 (4)
> [I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.4.2 (4)
> [I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-script-4.4.2 (4)
> [I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-sql-4.4.2 (4)
> [I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-svg-4.4.2 (4)
> [I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-test-4.4.2 (4)
> [I--] [ ~] x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.4.2 (4)
> $
> 
> Note that I have a number of the qt-*-4.4.2 components merged, but not 
> the qt-4.4.2 metapackage itself.  If I do a pretend emerge qt, it wants 
> to install two additional components (qt-xmlpatterns and qt-assistant) of 
> the metapackage I don't really need, before installing the metapackage 
> itself.
> 
> So unmerging qt-4.4.2 should be fine, as long as all you unmerge is the 
> metapackage.  You'll probably want to do a --depclean after that, and 
> unmerge the couple of likely unnecessary additional components, too.  Of 
> course, the usual warning before doing a depclean (or before removing the 
> --pretend) applies.  Make sure you've done an emerge update newuse world 
> first, and that revdep-rebuild doesn't list anything needing rebuilt.
> 
> Hopefully that solves the blocker, but I'm not sure.  I don't have PyQt4 
> installed, only PyQt-3.17.4.  Obviously, I don't have anything merged 
> that needs PyQt4.  Thus, I don't know its dependencies.  Well, let me 
> look...
> 
>>From what I see here, you should be fine, tho it's possible you'll need 
> to remerge PyQt4 as well.  An emerge pretend PyQt4 wants to install 
> -4.4.3 here, and it doesn't throw up any blockers.  So hopefully, once 
> you unmerge the metapackage, you'll be fine.  If not, it's likely in your 
> use flags.  Try playing around with them and see if you can avoid the 
> blocker.  I know I had to do that almost a year ago when I was playing 
> with the kde4 pre-releases, but I gave up when I saw 4.0 wasn't going to 
> be anywhere close to a 3.5 replacement for me, until 4.1.2 hit the tree 
> not long ago.  Thus, it's likely I already had my USE flags setup not to 
> conflict this time, due to having worked it out way back then.
> 
> Also note that I don't have /all/ of the kde-4.1.2 metapackage merged.  I 
> have most of the first level components (kdebase, kdegames, etc) merged, 
> but even there, I used set negation to avoid some of the packages I knew 
> I'd not use.  So it's possible you have packages with additional 
> dependencies merged, thus creating blockages I'm not seeing, even if your 
> USE flags matched mine 100%, which is unlikely.
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-23  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-21  9:18 [gentoo-amd64] Blocking package Sebastian Geiger
2008-10-21  9:56 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2008-10-23  1:26   ` Sebastian Geiger [this message]
2008-10-23  5:39     ` Duncan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48FFD2AE.9060403@gmx.net \
    --to=sbastig@gmx.net \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox