From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JrDrZ-0003Kr-NL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:04:53 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DAC8E084B; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from md2.t-2.net (md2.t-2.net [84.255.209.81]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E47E084B for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (84-255-203-94.static.t-2.net [84.255.203.94]) by md2.t-2.net (MOS 3.8.5-GA) with ESMTP id CKB28803; Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:04:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <48188AC2.70804@avtomatika.com> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:05:38 +0200 From: Branko Badrljica User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080302) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] boot Gentoo from USB key References: <1209537833.6170.62.camel@ws2912.agr.st.com> <481867A3.3070904@lakedaemon.net> <48188245.9010603@avtomatika.com> <4818866C.90109@lakedaemon.net> In-Reply-To: <4818866C.90109@lakedaemon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/150, host=md2.t-2.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0B020A.48188A91.00FB,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=192.168.0.11, so=2007-07-31 18:51:00, dmn=5.4.3/2008-02-01 X-Archives-Salt: 9795bbe5-4359-46c5-aede-fde233a6711a X-Archives-Hash: 4d9927e98b66a00f8e63e7e5ab5ff5cf Jason wrote: > > initrd is exactly how you do it. In the case of booting off of USB, > there are too many variables (drive detection order, different > hardware, etc) to handle on the kernel command line. An initrd gives > you the flexibility to solve these problems. > >> You could use initrd/initramfs, but seems like a lot of complications >> for little gain... > > I wouldn't call a portable, writable, boot from anywhere Linux OS on a > thumbdrive a trivial gain. ;-) > > Jason. > But y