public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-amd64] latest SAMBA problem
@ 2007-12-07 13:06 Mark Haney
  2007-12-07 13:18 ` Sebastian Redl
  2007-12-07 13:26 ` Brett Johnson
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Haney @ 2007-12-07 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-amd64

I've just updated to the latest Samba version and now my CIFS mounts
bomb with this error:


mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on
//192.168.10.9/noc-shares, missing codepage or other error

My mount command is pretty simple (in a shell script) just the mount
with a username and password, nothing fancy.  I originally had a umask
in the command, but that seems to have been deprecated.

Any ideas on how to fix this?


-- 
Recedite, plebes! Gero rem imperialem!


Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-amd64] latest SAMBA problem
  2007-12-07 13:06 [gentoo-amd64] latest SAMBA problem Mark Haney
@ 2007-12-07 13:18 ` Sebastian Redl
  2007-12-07 13:26 ` Brett Johnson
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Redl @ 2007-12-07 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-amd64

Mark Haney wrote:
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on
> //192.168.10.9/noc-shares, missing codepage or other error
>   
Do you specify a codepage? Maybe it became mandatory now.

Sebastian Redl
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-amd64] latest SAMBA problem
  2007-12-07 13:06 [gentoo-amd64] latest SAMBA problem Mark Haney
  2007-12-07 13:18 ` Sebastian Redl
@ 2007-12-07 13:26 ` Brett Johnson
  2007-12-07 13:34   ` Mark Haney
  2007-12-07 13:49   ` Mark Haney
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Brett Johnson @ 2007-12-07 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-amd64

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 802 bytes --]

On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 08:06:53AM -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
> I've just updated to the latest Samba version and now my CIFS mounts
> bomb with this error:
> 
> 
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on
> //192.168.10.9/noc-shares, missing codepage or other error
> 
> My mount command is pretty simple (in a shell script) just the mount
> with a username and password, nothing fancy.  I originally had a umask
> in the command, but that seems to have been deprecated.
> 
> Any ideas on how to fix this?
> 
The codepage problem may be you don't have the correct codepage compiled
in the kernel or the module is not loaded.

Also, I did see something in IRC that cifs is now a separate package in
gentoo, so you may want to try and (re) emerge net-fs/mount-cifs.

Brett

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-amd64] latest SAMBA problem
  2007-12-07 13:26 ` Brett Johnson
@ 2007-12-07 13:34   ` Mark Haney
  2007-12-07 13:49   ` Mark Haney
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Haney @ 2007-12-07 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-amd64

Brett Johnson wrote:

>>
> The codepage problem may be you don't have the correct codepage compiled
> in the kernel or the module is not loaded.
> 
> Also, I did see something in IRC that cifs is now a separate package in
> gentoo, so you may want to try and (re) emerge net-fs/mount-cifs.
> 
> Brett

I never saw this error before and I've not updated kernels in over a
month.  So unless this was a required option now, I don't think that's
the problem. I will however, re-emerge the mount package to see if that
fixes it.  I ran a ton of updates last night, and I don't remember
seeing mount-cifs as an update, but I could be wrong.


-- 
Recedite, plebes! Gero rem imperialem!


Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-amd64] latest SAMBA problem
  2007-12-07 13:26 ` Brett Johnson
  2007-12-07 13:34   ` Mark Haney
@ 2007-12-07 13:49   ` Mark Haney
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark Haney @ 2007-12-07 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-amd64

Brett Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 08:06:53AM -0500, Mark Haney wrote:
>> I've just updated to the latest Samba version and now my CIFS mounts
>> bomb with this error:
>>
>>
>> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on
>> //192.168.10.9/noc-shares, missing codepage or other error
>>
>> My mount command is pretty simple (in a shell script) just the mount
>> with a username and password, nothing fancy.  I originally had a umask
>> in the command, but that seems to have been deprecated.
>>
>> Any ideas on how to fix this?
>>
> The codepage problem may be you don't have the correct codepage compiled
> in the kernel or the module is not loaded.
> 
> Also, I did see something in IRC that cifs is now a separate package in
> gentoo, so you may want to try and (re) emerge net-fs/mount-cifs.
> 
> Brett

Weird, I didn't have mount-cifs installed at all on my system, so when I
emerged it, everything came up roses.  Thanks for the heads up.



-- 
Recedite, plebes! Gero rem imperialem!


Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415

Call (866) ERC-7110 for after hours support
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-07 13:52 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-12-07 13:06 [gentoo-amd64] latest SAMBA problem Mark Haney
2007-12-07 13:18 ` Sebastian Redl
2007-12-07 13:26 ` Brett Johnson
2007-12-07 13:34   ` Mark Haney
2007-12-07 13:49   ` Mark Haney

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox