Re: [gentoo-amd64] building emul-linux-x86 files

[Mike Doty <kingtaco@gentoo.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andy Wang wrote:
> Hi all (specifically KingTaco, as I think you're building most of these now)
> In the past, I've been using Blubb's documentation at:
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/emul/
> To setup my 32-bit chroot environment to build my own emul-linux
> packages.  Specifically, gconf, gnome-vfs and gnome packages for xdg
> and gnome integration into 32-bit firefox-bin.
> 
> With the new gnome 2.20 packages, I figure it's time to keep updated,
> and I see the new emul-linux-x86-*-[datestamp] ebuilds are a little
> different than before, is Blubb's old method of doing this still the
> most correct way or is there another better way of building emul
> packages?
> 
> Thanks in advance for any info on this stuff.  FYI, I'm more than
> willing to make my ebuild and tar.bz2 files available for anyone who
> wants gnome/xdg integration into 32-bit firefox-bin.
> Andy

That page is deprecated, the instructions invalid.  We've built a new
system, and emul-linux-x86-* have a new versioning scheme(YYYYMMDD).
There is no documentation yet for the new system, maybe in a month or 2.

- --
=======================================================
Mike Doty                      kingtaco -at- gentoo.org
Gentoo Infrastructure
Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead
GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6  F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05
=======================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iQCVAwUBR0cXeYBrouQZ9K4FAQL9rQP/dSRmx3mqC5jEQjxqUgSa+rDMFaLDe+lP
b1ShWMvQLA0A7NXUcOMUuuOS3aq0mB+9WqO2eF/MiC3sMIC3s9FXQD/HijoAwsZs
rx2u+ucETRzShf5e9+Fx3QdExatJWmQDqZ1s5qZCKNuZI58AD08uspaFd1uv35Qa
4jhrpXYhdpw=
=YgHc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list