public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "P.V.Anthony" <pvantony@singnet.com.sg>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Is there any difference with 4 core?
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 12:05:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46B2A986.60406@singnet.com.sg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708022335530.19563@melchior.nuitari.net>

On this day, 03-August-2007 11:39 AM,  Nuitari wrote:

> If you are going to do a lot of virtual servers then you'd probably want 
> to wait for the Barcelona chips.
> 
> What kind of loads do you expect?

Currently running on Supermicro 1U Pentium 4 2.8mhz with hyper threading 
for about two years. The average 15min load is only 0.31. The os is 
Fedora Core 1.

Thinking of setting up another server and move all the services to the 
multi-core server. Then have the Pentium 4 server as a backup.

Of course it will be gentoo and 64bit. And on kernel 2.6. Want to learn 
and try out Xen virtualization. More and more sites are now CMS based 
and I like WebGUI which runs on mod_perl. More clients want web based 
applications. So going to a more powerful server might help. I am hoping.

When is Barcelona coming out? Would it be expensive because it is new 
and a true 4 core chip?

 From reading the posts, it seems that memory is very very important. 
Wondering if it is better going with a 2 core cpu and put the savings on 
more ram. Originally thinking of 4g. Maybe the ram should go to 8g.

Plus it is paranoia. Just afraid that something on the Pentium 4 might 
fail. Since it is already two years old.

P.V.Anthony

PS: going with tyan because from this list, it seems that tyan has good 
support for linux.



-- 
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list



  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-03  4:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-01 15:16 [gentoo-amd64] Is there any difference with 4 core? P.V.Anthony
2007-08-01 15:27 ` Wil Reichert
2007-08-01 15:41   ` P.V.Anthony
2007-08-01 15:44 ` Bob Sanders
2007-08-01 20:12 ` Martin Nielsen
2007-08-01 23:13 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2007-08-02  8:58 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Pascal BERTIN
2007-08-02  9:57   ` P.V.Anthony
2007-08-02 14:27     ` Bob Sanders
2007-08-03  2:36       ` P.V.Anthony
     [not found]     ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708021008180.12943@thing.com>
2007-08-03  2:30       ` P.V.Anthony
2007-08-03  3:39         ` Nuitari
2007-08-03  4:05           ` P.V.Anthony [this message]
2007-08-03 14:23             ` Bob Sanders

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46B2A986.60406@singnet.com.sg \
    --to=pvantony@singnet.com.sg \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox