From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1IBuZv-00085F-T2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:39:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l6KFafPh013469; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:36:41 GMT Received: from mail.nagafix.co.uk (mail.nagafix.co.uk [194.145.196.85]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l6KFae3B013440 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:36:41 GMT Received: from [192.168.1.123] (ANancy-151-1-69-23.w81-49.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.49.175.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: antoine@nagafix.co.uk) by mail.nagafix.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A3743B47 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:36:39 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <46A0D680.30708@nagafix.co.uk> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:36:32 +0100 From: Antoine Martin User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] 32 or 64 for web server and mysql References: <46A0B6C6.5000803@singnet.com.sg> <20070720144310.GJ3830@v.igoro.us> <1184944855.6525.13.camel@athena.fprintf.net> In-Reply-To: <1184944855.6525.13.camel@athena.fprintf.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 548fc49d-55e1-4262-9c0f-61ef7950913c X-Archives-Hash: f5faf4712743e6845244fe9f2886bfc7 > In my limited speed testing, my 64-bit installs were all faster for my > general use cases (basically desktop) than 32-bit on the same hardware. > My server is also 64-bit (I run lighttpd/php/netqmail/mysql), and it's > rock solid, but I never did any performance testing on it. > I did do some benchmarks of 32-bit vs 64-bit databases on the same hardware (via JDBC), and generally speaking 64-bit was faster (but not much) - except for MySQL Inserts (I never figured out why that was): http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/JavaLinuxDatabases/architecture.jsp /shameless plug Antoine -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list