public inbox for gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gavin Seddon <gavin.m.seddon@manchester.ac.uk>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64]
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 03:24:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46919C4F.8000109@manchester.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070706152051.GA25052@v.igoro.us>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2429 bytes --]

Dustin J. Mitchell wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 09:02:05AM -0400, B. Nice wrote:
>>> I also feel a little guilty that my only contribution as an AT is to
>>> make fun of people trying to unsubscribe from the list.  It's not
>>> exactly productive, and only serves to reinforce the bad rep that Gentoo
>>> has.
>> Where do people get the idea that Gentoo has a bad reputation?  I've
> 
> Well, keep in mind that I run in what is probably a slightly different
> circle -- server admins.
> 
> Gentoo has a *lot* to recommend it technically for administering a
> server -- fine-grained control, careful management of the upgrade path,
> transparency, extensibility, etc.
> 
> But the cultural shift is painful when folks like me try to interact
> with the Gentoo user or developer community.  I think I'm a fairly
> technically adept person (hey, I passed the ebuild quiz), yet several of
> my bugs have been blown off fairly rudely, by developers who had
> obviously not read the entire bug.  Of course, interactions on IRC are
> even worse.  
> 
> The result is that I don't file bugs anymore -- I make a fixed local
> copy of the ebuild and call it a day.  Since I can't recommend that my
> clients and employers do the same, I set them up with a RedHat-derived
> base system and then hand-compile the necessary software on top of that.
> 
> By way of comparison, problems I have had with specific pieces of
> business-critical software (vs. with the distro) have been handled with
> professionalism and dignity.
> 
> Maybe the problem is that Gentoo devs are *too* accessible, and aren't
> really given a choice in the matter.  Does e.g.,
> https://bugzilla.novell.com/ see the same level of activity as Gentoo's?
> I imagine that a lot of the grumpy devs would probably do well just
> sitting in the background and coding.
> 
> Those are my musings..
> 
> Dustin
> 
> P.S. I should add that the amd64 group does not seem to share these
> difficutlies -- this list is sometimes irreverent, but never insulting.
Hi,
I have opened this thread by accident, pls excuse if I'm butting in.  I 
now have Gentoo running on alpha, x86, the laptop, amd64 and soon to be 
mips.  I subscribe to all lists tho' I rarely post..


When I first started a few years ago coming from Debian, the users where 
very helpful but I to was intimidated with some kirt remarks.  I think 
one should remember gentoo can be an intimidating system
Gavin

[-- Attachment #2: gavin.m.seddon.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 295 bytes --]

begin:vcard
fn:Dr Gavin Seddon
org:University of Manchester;Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
adr:;;Oxford road;Manchester;;M13 9PL;UK
email;internet:gavin.m.seddon@manchester.ac.uk
title:Dr Gavin Seddon
tel;work:0161 702 9945
tel;cell:07710430455
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-07-09 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-06  2:02 [gentoo-amd64] Joshua Hoblitt
2007-07-06  2:25 ` [gentoo-amd64] Dustin J. Mitchell
2007-07-06 13:02   ` [gentoo-amd64] B. Nice
2007-07-06 15:20     ` [gentoo-amd64] Dustin J. Mitchell
2007-07-06 17:51       ` [gentoo-amd64] Duncan
2007-07-06 18:17         ` Beso
2007-07-06 17:56       ` [gentoo-amd64] Beso
2007-07-09  2:24       ` Gavin Seddon [this message]
2007-07-10  9:07         ` [gentoo-amd64] Duncan
     [not found] <20081123120010.F2CB5E05BE@pigeon.gentoo.org>
2008-11-23 12:30 ` [gentoo-amd64] David Burkinshaw
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-15 22:27 [gentoo-amd64] Janus Rasmussen
2005-08-12  3:07 [gentoo-amd64] Ben
2005-08-12 10:45 ` [gentoo-amd64] Simon Stelling
2005-08-12 12:38   ` [gentoo-amd64] Drew Kirkpatrick
2005-08-12 19:19     ` [gentoo-amd64] phil
2005-08-12 22:11       ` [gentoo-amd64] Dice R. Random
2005-08-12 22:48         ` [gentoo-amd64] felix
2005-08-12  0:15 [gentoo-amd64] Ben
2005-08-12  8:47 ` [gentoo-amd64] Simon Stelling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46919C4F.8000109@manchester.ac.uk \
    --to=gavin.m.seddon@manchester.ac.uk \
    --cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox