From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HiElH-0003YP-K0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 19:08:44 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l3TJ5Gci002614; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 19:05:16 GMT Received: from mtai05.charter.net (mtai05.charter.net [209.225.8.185]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l3TJ5FS9002581 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 19:05:15 GMT Received: from aa09.charter.net ([10.20.200.161]) by mtai05.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20070429190514.RFL1417.mtai05.charter.net@aa09.charter.net> for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 15:05:14 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.102] (really [66.168.26.198]) by aa09.charter.net with ESMTP id <20070429190514.GWFE17761.aa09.charter.net@[192.168.1.102]> for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 15:05:14 -0400 Message-ID: <4634EC6E.4010704@charter.net> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:05:18 -0500 From: William Tetrault User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070422) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Kernel 2.6.21 problem References: <200704291137.31330.prh@gotadsl.co.uk> <5bdc1c8b0704291125p43127c64jd20e3750b08740fe@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0704291125p43127c64jd20e3750b08740fe@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chzlrs: 0 X-Archives-Salt: ec1e7e8e-3d95-4204-9aa6-55c8bb84e0ae X-Archives-Hash: 5c5db642639267e48a0f0a0c357bc213 Mark Knecht wrote: > On 4/29/07, Peter Humphrey wrote: >> On syncing today I was offered gentoo-sources-2.6.21. On attempting to >> compile it I get: snip >> Rgds >> Peter Humphrey >> Linux Counter 5290, Aug 93 > > Hi Peter, snip > Before filing a bug report I'd suggest building 2.6.21 from > kernel.org instead of gentoo-sources to see if it's a kernel problem > or something introduced by our developers. > > Good luck, > Mark Use vanilla-sources rather than current from kernel.org. It's the same thing and allows you to use portage. Bill -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list