From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HPh7U-00019w-7E for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:35:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l29FVcnf005232; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:31:38 GMT Received: from mail.ercbroadband.org (mail.ercbroadband.org [152.53.1.9]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l29FVaD8005189 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:31:37 GMT X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) Exchange SpamAssassin Sink (www.christopherlewis.com) 1.2.76 on chapman.ercbroadband.local X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=7.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7 thread-index: AcdiX7ebiaSiLGUoQROBSeLTbNYeXQ== Received: from [192.168.10.35] ([192.168.10.35]) by mail.ercbroadband.org with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 9 Mar 2007 10:29:24 -0500 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2826 Message-ID: <45F17D52.6050306@ercbroadband.org> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:29:22 -0500 From: "Mark Haney" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070305) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] WTF did I do? References: <45F1636E.9070400@ercbroadband.org> <200703091351.40089.cryos@gentoo.org> <45F16980.3070509@ercbroadband.org> <200703091431.11424.cryos@gentoo.org> <45F1718A.9000908@ercbroadband.org> <45F179F0.4000505@getdesigned.at> In-Reply-To: <45F179F0.4000505@getdesigned.at> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Mar 2007 15:29:24.0520 (UTC) FILETIME=[B79BBA80:01C7625F] X-Archives-Salt: 5609136b-a707-477e-a7f2-69017999dad4 X-Archives-Hash: 2e88e0e3e86751ed9c76c4af249de94c Sebastian Redl wrote: > Mark Haney wrote: >> Which is exactly what I did. I had assumed that since the profile was >> there (and I run the stable branch for almost everything) that is was >> 'stable' and released. I'll know to double check that next time. > The stable/testing distinction only applies to what is actually > installed, not to what is in the portage tree. You'll still get ebuilds > for testing packages, too. > > Sebastian Redl I am aware of that, however I would have expected the same behaviour from the profiles as well. Apparently that's not the case. I'm going to chalk this up to bad (or good) timing since that profile was listed on the day I thought to check and see if a new profile was available. -- Ita erat quando hic adveni. Mark Haney Sr. Systems Administrator ERC Broadband (828) 350-2415 -- gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list