From: "Mark Haney" <mhaney@ercbroadband.org>
To: <gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] WTF did I do?
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 09:39:06 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F1718A.9000908@ercbroadband.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703091431.11424.cryos@gentoo.org>
Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
> On Friday 09 March 2007 14:04:48 Mark Haney wrote:
>> Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
>>> rm /etc/make.profile
>>> ln -s /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/amd64/2006.1 /etc/make.profile
>>>
>>> Then all will be well again.
>> Okay, now I'm confused. I've been running (and updating portage) using
>> that profile since Feb 21. So how is that possible?
>
> I think there was a testing version of the 2007.0 profile in the tree, it is
> not there now. I have no clue how you managed to be using 2007.0 unless you
> made the updated link yourself.
Which is exactly what I did. I had assumed that since the profile was
there (and I run the stable branch for almost everything) that is was
'stable' and released. I'll know to double check that next time.
>
> I have a system I installed two days ago which used 2006.1, it is now using
> 2006.1/desktop, then I have several other systems I administor using 2006.0
> or 2006.1. Changing the symlink will fix your issue, the new profiles should
> not be used until that version is released as they are *experimental*, i.e.
> things are being tried out in them etc.
>
> Right now I am busy writing up my thesis and so I am not sure exactly why they
> have been removed from the tree as I don't have time to keep up with
> everything in the amd64 herd. I would highly recommend using 2006.1/desktop
> for desktop systems and making the switch to 2007.1 once the release is made.
--
Ita erat quando hic adveni.
Mark Haney
Sr. Systems Administrator
ERC Broadband
(828) 350-2415
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-09 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-09 13:38 [gentoo-amd64] WTF did I do? Mark Haney
2007-03-09 13:51 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2007-03-09 14:04 ` Mark Haney
2007-03-09 14:28 ` Steev Klimaszewski
2007-03-09 14:31 ` Marcus D. Hanwell
2007-03-09 14:39 ` Mark Haney [this message]
2007-03-09 15:14 ` Sebastian Redl
2007-03-09 15:29 ` Mark Haney
2007-03-09 14:37 ` Mark Haney
2007-03-10 13:58 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Stefan Wimmer
2007-03-12 12:22 ` Mark Haney
2007-03-09 16:15 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Jean-Marc Hengen
2007-03-09 14:01 ` Brett Johnson
2007-03-09 14:35 ` Marek Wróbel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45F1718A.9000908@ercbroadband.org \
--to=mhaney@ercbroadband.org \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox