From: PaulNM <gentoo@paulscrap.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-amd64] MAKEOPTS values for Athlon 64 X2
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:42:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45AB1451.9010005@paulscrap.com> (raw)
Hey folks,
I'm wondering if anyone has experimented with different values for
MAKEOPTS="-jx" on Athlon 64 X2's. The guides usually suggest # of
cores/processors plus one. Looking at "man make.conf" doesn't help much,
it just says "Suggested settings are between CPUs+1 and 2*CPUs+1". The
only thing "man make" mentions about the "-j" option is "If the -j
option is given without an argument, make will not limit the number of
jobs that can run simultaneously." I've also seen some mentions of -j9
by people with dual core systems elsewhere, indicating it drastically
speed up some emerges.
So this leaves me with several possibilities. There's -j3 (current
setting), -j5, -j (no limit), -j9, or some other random number. Any
suggestions/warnings/links would be appreciated.
Thanks,
PaulNM
--
gentoo-amd64@gentoo.org mailing list
next reply other threads:[~2007-01-15 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-15 5:42 PaulNM [this message]
2007-01-15 9:17 ` [gentoo-amd64] MAKEOPTS values for Athlon 64 X2 Toshinori Endo
2007-01-15 15:39 ` Thomas Rösner
2007-01-15 18:10 ` [gentoo-amd64] " Duncan
2007-01-15 23:32 ` Thomas Rösner
2007-01-16 8:28 ` Andrei Slavoiu
2007-01-16 10:27 ` Neil Bothwick
2007-01-16 16:15 ` Peter Humphrey
2007-01-17 2:41 ` Thomas Rösner
2007-01-17 7:47 ` Duncan
2007-01-17 12:34 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-01-17 17:24 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-01-17 19:02 ` Bernhard Auzinger
2007-01-17 21:22 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-01-18 4:50 ` Duncan
2007-01-18 16:12 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-01-18 16:16 ` Rob Lesslie
2007-01-18 18:10 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-01-18 18:35 ` Simon Stelling
2007-01-18 19:13 ` Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
2007-01-18 19:51 ` Simon Stelling
2007-01-26 8:49 ` Peter Humphrey
2007-01-26 23:18 ` Thomas Rösner
2007-01-18 18:41 ` Duncan
2007-01-18 18:51 ` Hemmann, Volker Armin
2007-01-18 19:17 ` Duncan
2007-01-18 19:36 ` Bob Young
2007-01-18 19:42 ` Harry Holt
2007-01-19 7:57 ` Duncan
2007-01-26 0:46 ` Peter Humphrey
2007-01-16 11:11 ` Duncan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45AB1451.9010005@paulscrap.com \
--to=gentoo@paulscrap.com \
--cc=gentoo-amd64@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox